Overall condition: Good
Superstructure condition rating: Very Good(8 out of 9)
Substructure condition rating: Very Good(8 out of 9)
Deck condition rating: Very Good(8 out of 9)
Sufficiency rating: 82.3 (out of 100) View more at BridgeReports.com
Categories
Update Log
April 6, 2018: New photos from Richard Doody
October 25, 2017: Updated by Michael Quiet: Removed Pratt truss; This is a concrete stringer. Removed reference to height/weight restrictions. Imported NBI data
October 25, 2017: New Street View added by Matthew
Posted October 25, 2017, by Michael Quiet (mquiet [at] gmail [dot] com)
A couple of problems here:
This is not a Pratt truss. This is a concrete stringer bridge with a wooden cover added. The internal truss is patterned on a Multiple Kingspost system, but that is merely for decoration. The previous bridge lost in Irene was the same deal, being a 1930's steel stringer with a faux wooden cover added in 1970.
There was mention of having a height and weight restriction? The National Bridge Inventory says that this bridge is open with no restrictions, and there is no signage around this bridge indicating one. The previous one did, but not this one.
A couple of problems here:
This is not a Pratt truss. This is a concrete stringer bridge with a wooden cover added. The internal truss is patterned on a Multiple Kingspost system, but that is merely for decoration. The previous bridge lost in Irene was the same deal, being a 1930's steel stringer with a faux wooden cover added in 1970.
There was mention of having a height and weight restriction? The National Bridge Inventory says that this bridge is open with no restrictions, and there is no signage around this bridge indicating one. The previous one did, but not this one.