Rating:
7 votes

BO - Harmar Bridge

Photos 

Photo taken by John Goold in November 2011

Enlarge

BH Photo #221111

Street Views 

Videos 

Hamar Bridge

Time-lapse video of bridge being opened July 26, 2015, shot by Dave Boley

Dave Boley via Facebook (https://www.facebook.com/www.HarmarVillageMariettaOhio )

Play video

Hamar Bridge

Time-lapse of bridge opening July 26, 2015 by John J. Burgardt

John J. Burgardt via Facebook (https://www.facebook.com/john.j.burgardt/videos/vb.1072357772/10205752108936600/?type=2&theater )

Play video

Description 

https://www.saveharmarbridge.com

☞ 1856 - est. 1st as a covered bridge for pedestrian & wagon traffic [some sources state 1857] ☞ 1873 - transformed into railroad bridge for M&C RR [1860's by some] ☞ 1884 - flood destroys it - rebuilt w/swing span allowing larger vessels to pass through ☞ March 1913 - destroyed by our worst flood - a crest at 58.7 feet. "The flood swept 120 homes away [and] knocked 200 homes off their foundations" Note: every bridge on the Muskingum River was either destroyed or severely damaged by that flood. ☞ 1967 - B & O RR last train crosses the bridge ☞ 1988 - Historical Harmar Bridge Company purchases bridge for $10. ☞ Sunday, March 1, 2020 - closed 4 needed rehab. ☞ Bridge span opened by hand: * 2x yearly during Harmar Days Festival * When high water or floods limit the passage of the Valley Gem * When the W. P. Snyder leaves the Muskingum River for needed repairs or work

Facts 

Overview
Pratt through truss bridge with manual swing draw span over Muskingum River on Railroad now pedestrian only
Location
Marietta, Washington County, Ohio
Status
Closed to all traffic.
History
Built 1913; purchased from B&O for $10 and converted to pedestrian use 1967; Rehabbed in 2007
Railroad
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad (BO)
Design
East to west:
Timber trestle approach over pedestrian walkway
Pin-connected, 8-panel Pratt through truss swing span
(2)7-panel, pin-connected Pratt through truss
Riveted, 6-panel Warren through truss with all verticals
Timber trestle approach over Fort Street
Dimensions
Length of largest span: 167.0 ft.
Total length: 800.0 ft.
Also called
Harmar Rail-Trail - Muskigum River Bridge
Harmar Bridge
Approximate latitude, longitude
+39.41183, -81.45714   (decimal degrees)
39°24'43" N, 81°27'26" W   (degrees°minutes'seconds")
Approximate UTM coordinates
17/460646/4362578 (zone/easting/northing)
Quadrangle map:
Marietta
Inventory number
BH 50349 (Bridgehunter.com ID)

Update Log 

  • August 7, 2022: Updated by Paul Plassman: Added categories "7-panel truss", "8-panel truss", "Navigable waterway", "Stone piers", "Center Pivot Swing Span"
  • May 21, 2022: New photo from Paul Plassman
  • February 10, 2022: New photos from Bambi Sharkoman
  • December 31, 2021: Updated by Alexander D. Mitchell IV: added history from local website/Facebook page
  • May 28, 2020: New photos from David Case
  • December 22, 2019: New photo from Geoff Hubbs
  • November 21, 2016: Updated by Christopher Finigan: Added category "Pin-connected"
  • November 20, 2016: New Street View added by Dana and Kay Klein
  • July 27, 2015: New video from Alexander D. Mitchell IV
  • June 24, 2014: Updated by Luke Harden: Added info
  • November 29, 2011: Updated by Clark Vance: Location and street view
  • November 28, 2011: Added by John Goold

Related Bridges 

Sources 

Comments 

BO - Harmar Bridge
Posted December 31, 2021, by Nathan Holth (webmaster [at] historicbridges [dot] org)

To respond to John's old comment here, I STRONGLY agree that the bridge's truss spans, particularly the swing span with no "tower" at the center is most certainly older than 1913. The swing span, which lacks the "tower" at the center is reminiscent of extremely old swing trusses (1880s) although I have not yet visited this bridge (its on my list to visit) to try to confirm this, and current photos on the Internet do not provide the level of detail required. Evaluation of connection details, any iron/steel brands, etc would be potentially useful to try to date the spans. Given the scale of destruction that the 1913 flood caused it is not surprising at all that an old truss might have been moved here. There wouldn't have been enough fabricators in the world to replace all the bridges that were lost in that flood in the timeframe that everyone wanted their bridges fixed after that disaster, so creative solutions to reopen infrastructure were no doubt used.

BO - Harmar Bridge
Posted February 5, 2021, by John Marvig (marvigj27 [at] gmail [dot] com)

Is this bridge older than 1913? The two center spans appear to be older, maybe ca. 1895? The swing span also appears to be a little newer, but not 1913. Reportedly, the stationary spans were replaced after the 1913 flood, but the swing span survived. The stationary spans very well could have been moved from another location.

Harmar Bridge
Posted May 28, 2020, by David Case

Swing span is swung to prevent people from crossing the bridge. Fundraising effort is underway.

Harmar Bridge
Posted February 12, 2015, by ArtS (asuckewer [at] knite [dot] com)

Interesting article on a group's fundraising efforts to restore this bridge:

http://www.mariettatimes.com/page/content.detail/id/569973/A...