It's definitely a Smith Product.
Not only did Toledo move on from the Lattice portals to ones with X bracing, but by 1899 the verticals on their ponies were solid and tapered.
Transliteration errors of that kind aren't uncommon...
Not to mention that the webbed-lattice portal design appears much more characteristic of a late-1880's Smith span than a Toledo one from the late 1890's, when the portals by then seem to have incorporated a less complex design with larger members.
I am somewhat skeptical of the 1899 date for this bridge as that would mean there was a ten-year gap between the destruction of the covered bridge in 1889 and its replacement. Given that the numbers 1889 and 1899 are only one digit off, I have to wonder if the 1899 date is an error.
Definitely 1889 or thereabouts then.