Rating:
No votes cast

Granville Viaduct

Licking County, Ohio

Photos 

Office of Licking County Engineer

Enlarge

BH Photo #491077

Map 

Street View 

Description 

15-span steel beam bridge with concrete piers. First rehab in 1964 saw reinforced concrete beams and concrete encased steel beams removed and rolled steel beams with concrete deck installed. Second rehab in 2005 involved rehab of concrete deck and piers and spot-painting the beams.

Facts 

Overview
Steel stringer bridge over Raccoon Creek on Columbus Rd C539B
Location
Granville, Licking County, Ohio
Status
Open to traffic
History
Built 1929, Rehabilitated 1964, 2005
Design
Steel stringer bridge with non-composite concrete deck and 1 intermediate expansion joint
Dimensions
Length of largest span: 45.0 ft.
Total length: 617.5 ft.
Deck width: 25.0 ft.
Approximate latitude, longitude
+40.06421, -82.52511   (decimal degrees)
40°03'51" N, 82°31'30" W   (degrees°minutes'seconds")
Approximate UTM coordinates
17/369936/4435997 (zone/easting/northing)
Land survey
Granville Twp
Inventory numbers
4536940
BH 92219 (Bridgehunter.com ID)

Categories 

Beam (16,895)
Built 1929 (1,058)
Built during 1920s (10,259)
Continuous (2,634)
Granville, Ohio (1)
Have street view (28,927)
Licking County, Ohio (74)
 Ohio (4,202)
Open (40,971)
Owned by county (21,618)
Span length 25-50 feet (16,233)
Steel stringer (6,715)
Total length 500-1000 feet (3,066)

Update Log 

  • February 22, 2021: Added by William Evans

Sources 

  • William Evans - bevans [at] lcounty [dot] com
Post a comment here

Comments 

Granville Viaduct
Posted February 22, 2021, by William Evans

The 1964 rehab plans describe the existing superstructure as "reinforced concrete beams and concrete encased steel beams."

Granville Viaduct
Posted February 22, 2021, by Paul

The decoratively arched concrete piers look to be original from 1929, but I assume the steel stringer superstructure was replaced in 1964 and/or 2005? The railings look mid-20th century so the steel beams are likely 1964 but were rehabbed in 2005, is that a reasonable interpretation of the various build/rehab dates for this bridge?