Posted May 1, 2022, by P. McCue (ilcuontv [at] aol [dot] com)
Lived & worked in the area for 50 years. 'Word on the street' [not confirmed, but makes sense] is that when railroad originally went through, landowner was going to be cut off from the local road (Kings Hyway) by the new RR cut. So the deed [to the RR] specified that the RR had to provide access to the property owner 'in perpetuity'. The bridge re-build was paid for by the RR.
Lived & worked in the area for 50 years. 'Word on the street' [not confirmed, but makes sense] is that when railroad originally went through, landowner was going to be cut off from the local road (Kings Hyway) by the new RR cut. So the deed [to the RR] specified that the RR had to provide access to the property owner 'in perpetuity'. The bridge re-build was paid for by the RR.