About this site

Introduction

Bridgehunter.com was founded in 2002 and run by James Baughn until he passed away in December 2020. The website is now maintained by the Historic Bridge Foundation. Please scroll down to "What's the purpose of this site?" to see an introduction to the website written by James Baughn.

Contact Us: Questions, Concerns, and New Users

Bridgehunter.com does not maintain an email account. If you have a question about a bridge or the website, please visit the forum on the website and post your question. A user account is not required. The many contributors and users on Bridgehunter.com will address your question. If you wish to request a user account so you can contribute photos and information to Bridgehunter.com, please fill out the New User Registration Form, and post a comment in the forum introducing yourself to the friendly Bridgehunter.com community, and requesting activation of your account, using the email address you chose when filling out the registration. An administrator will respond to your request and activate your account.

Other general concerns about Bridgehunter.com may be addressed to the Historic Bridge Foundation directly, however please note that the Historic Bridge Foundation is unable to respond to questions about individual bridges on Bridgehunter.com. Please make use of the forums for any discussions or questions relating to individual bridges.

Legal Information

Bridgehunter.com is not a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it a hired consultant for any government agency, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency.

Like Wikipedia, Bridgehunter.com is composed of user-edited and contributed content. Bridgehunter.com offers no guarantee as to the accuracy to information offered as fact on Bridgehunter.com, and will not be held responsible for any consequences resulting from the use of such information. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Those making use of information from Bridgehunter.com have the responsibility of confirming and verifying its accuracy. Bridgehunter.com also offers numerous opinions and commentary on the website, and these opinions are the opinions of the respective Bridgehunter.com member (or member of the public) who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else.

Government agencies and other owners of bridges have the responsibility to understand the legal status of Bridgehunter.com and its members. Bridgehunter.com content is not and may not be used in place of official content, correspondence, and communications of governments and any government agency or organization. Bridgehunter.com is not responsible for any consequences resulting from the use or misuse of Bridgehunter.com content, correspondence, and communications in this manner. Owners and users of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of the circumstances.

Bridgehunter.com and all its content is by default copyright and should be considered "All Rights Reserved." This includes, but is not limited to, the many photos appearing on Bridgehunter.com. Some content on Bridgehunter.com is old enough so as to be out of copyright and in the public domain. Some content may also be licenced through a Creative Commons license, which allows for reuse under specific conditions. This content may be mixed in with Bridgehunter.com copyrighted content, and users have the responsibility of discerning between content under copyright and out of copyright, and any content licensed under Creative Commons. For the convenience of website users, Bridgehunter.com has attempted to provide citation for many of these out-of-copyright resources, however Bridgehunter.com makes no guarantee of the accuracy of these citations and assumes no responsibility for these citations. Bridgehunter.com reserves the right to take any and all appropriate legal action to protect its content. You as the website visitor and/or user have the responsibility to comply with all applicable laws, regulations, and policies.

Bridgehunter.com includes many photographs and images from outside contributors. Photographers who submit photos to Bridgehunter.com for display on the website give Bridgehunter.com permanent and irrevocable permission to display the photo(s) on Bridgehunter.com. By default, Bridgehunter.com will consider photos provided to Bridgehunter.com to be the property of the photographer, and all rights to the photo will be retained by the photographer, with the exception that the terms and permission to display the photo on Bridgehunter.com may not be revoked. Anyone wishing to use copyrighted photos on Bridgehunter.com that were taken by an outside contributor must contact the third party photographer for permission to make use of the photo. By default and unless otherwise noted, any third party photos are and should be assumed to be copyrighted and "All Rights Reserved."

If you are the owner of a copyrighted photo that has been posted to Bridgehunter.com without permission by one of our users, please either post a comment in the forum for the bridge page in question, or contact the Historic Bridge Foundation and the images in question will be removed.

Bridgehunter.com is intended to be a resource and community accessible and appropriate to people of all ages. It is expected that all users of the website will be respectful and courteous. The Historic Bridge Foundation reserves the right to remove any inappropriate content posted to the website that does not meet this expectation.

What's the purpose of this site? By James Baughn, Founder

(Or, a Not-So-Brief Introduction)

Much of today's historical research centers on genealogy, which seeks to answer questions about "who." But all of this knowledge about ancestors and family trees and relationships tends to overlook other important questions. How did these people live? Where did they go? What was life like in those days? Have things changed since then -- or not?

A horse-drawn wagon crosses a bridge in Arkansas in 1939 [Photo courtesy AHTD]

It may seem silly, but this is where the study of historic bridges can prove useful. Some of these structures have stood unaltered for decades, just as our great-great-great-ancestors would have seen them. They may have been originally designed to carry horse-drawn wagons, but some are still capable of handling heavier automobiles today... if they receive proper maintenance and repairs.

Railroads have disappeared. Whole towns have vanished or relocated. Buildings have come and gone, or been remodeled beyond recognition. But bridges have remained intact, a silent reminder of our ancestor's way of life, and a tribute to skillful engineers who had no comprehension of modern school buses or SUVs -- and yet were able to build structure capable of standing the test of time.

But sadly, most people don't pay much attention to these historic monuments -- until they are gone. With Federal funding available for bridge replacements, county officials often aren't interested in rehabilitation or preservation. Why bother saving a rusting hulk when it can be replaced with a shiny new concrete span mostly paid by somebody else?

The problem, of course, is that the shiny new span will quickly turn into a downright boring eyesore that sticks out like a sore thumb against its surroundings. Nobody cares about a dull concrete bridge with monotonous guardrails and no charm whatsoever. Sure, these modern structures might be safer and stronger, but historic bridges can be brought up to current standards with proper care.

If an old railroad bridge could support a string of fully-loaded locomotives, then surely it can handle an SUV or two (unless it's in total disrepair). During their heyday, truss bridges represented the state-of-the-art for designs that were durable but yet affordable. We shouldn't bulldoze them just because they're old. Meanwhile, a well-built stone arch bridge is practically indestructible -- just look at the bridges in Rome that have carried traffic for over two millennia.

On the other hand, it's unrealistic to think that we can preserve every interesting bridge. Many old bridges are simply too deteriorated to worry about. Some are located at inconvenient places for future development. Some can't realistically carry modern traffic, no matter how much is spent on rehabilitation.


Modern-day truss bridge in Colorado, built 1998

However, we should certainly save what we can. If it costs the same (or in some cases, less) to rehabilitate rather than replace, let's do it. If a bridge must be replaced, then let's try to give it some other use, such as a pedestrian crossing. And if all else fails, then we should certainly preserve it "on paper" with photographs and documentation.

The purpose of this site, then, is to assemble a database of the historic bridges in the Central United States. This includes everything from minor stone culverts to sweeping suspension bridges to massive steel truss spans. This also covers past, present, and future -- bridges that are long gone, those that are still standing, and those that might be built in the future using historic designs.

That last sentence is not a mistake. Even though truss bridges have fallen out of fashion, some companies still build them for roads and trails. These designs are not completely obsolete; the engineers of yesteryear knew things that we can still utilize today. Our new bridges don't always need to be ugly monstrosities -- heck, even covered bridges are making a small comeback.

One of the sayings in history is "the more things change, the more they stay the same." The study of historic bridges easily drives home that point.

How did this get started?

I've had many people say that they first become interested in bridges because they live (or grew up) near a particularly interesting one. While I've always had a budding fascination with civil engineering, this site didn't get started until I "discovered" the Wappapello Bridge in Wayne County, Missouri.


Wappapello Bridge

This bridge sits very close to a tourist area, Lake Wappepllo, but is largely unknown. It's just off the main highway, but on a little-used side road. It's never mentioned in any tourist brochure. And yet this is one of the most magnificient bridges in Southeast Missouri.

Built in 1911, it has a single 210 foot clear span, large even by modern standards. Its Pennsylvania truss design was state-of-the-art at the time. And remarkably, the company that built it, Stupp Brothers, is still a family-owned business that builds steel bridges (among other things).

It also happens to be in poor condition and scheduled for replacement. But when I first stumbled across this bridge, I thought, "Wow, why doesn't anybody know about this?" I only found it because I was vaguely curious about where the road went and I had a few minutes to kill.

After other leisurely drives, I found more and more of these historic structures. And I also found a few that had been recently replaced, with perhaps an old pier or piece of discarded metal as the only remaining artifacts of their existence.

I knew: Somebody needs to document these things before they are lost. If some low-budget history museum can get mentioned in the tourist brochures, then why not a real historic site that is still being used? If people are willing to drive long distances to see a covered bridge, then why not a truss bridge? (It could be argued that a covered bridge is merely a truss bridge with a roof.)

As with most websites, this one started small, with photos of a few dozen bridges. But I quickly learned that I'm not the only one with a passion for history and civil engineering, and now this site features photos and information from dozens of contributors in several states. That's good; it means I'm not as weird as I thought...

Do you have any words of wisdom for finding bridges?

No, but here's a few pointless observations I've made:

1. The farther you drive to reach a bridge, the more likely it has already been replaced.

2. The best place to photograph a bridge is often posted with signs like, "No Trespassing -- Violators Will Be Sold As Slaves" and "Warning: My Dog Can Outrun You".

3. When trying to find the turnoff for a bridge, some fool will always appear out of nowhere and start tailgating you. But even though they are in some massive hurry, they will never pass you -- except perhaps on the most dangerous curve on the entire road.

4. The local sheriff deputy will always assume that you're a member of a terrorist organization because you're taking photos of bridges. As if Al Qaida is going to be interested in blowing up some pony truss in the middle of nowhere that carries 10 cars per day...

5. If a bridge only carries 10 cars per day, half of them will want to cross while you're standing in the middle with nowhere to go.

6. Don't block somebody's driveway while stopping to look at a bridge, even if nobody is around -- nine times out of ten the owner will suddenly appear wanting in or out. (This phenomenon is probably tied to Murphy's Law somehow.)

7. After remaining on the bridge for 95 years intact, the builder's plaques will disappear the week before you visit. (This happened to the Laflin Bridge.)

8. What looks like a high-quality road on your map will inevitably turn into a dead-end muddy quagmire.

9. Be careful where you step, and don't lean too heavily on any guardrails.

10. One-lane bridges always attract opposing traffic just before you reach them.