Recent Utah Comments

Post a comment Contact webmaster

Posted April 2, 2013, by Anonymous

Wow, really appreciate the photos from down below.

Posted March 12, 2013, by Luke Harden (lukemh9 [at] gmail [dot] com)

I'm also seeing a plaque

Posted March 12, 2013, by Clark Vance (cvance [at] dogmail [dot] com)

I'm seeing a Warren with verticals.

Posted February 14, 2013, by Gene McCluney (gmacfilm [at] live [dot] com)

A Pegram truss is a rare find.

Posted January 30, 2013, by Don Morrison

Yup. Nathan is correct. The streetview on the Bridge Street Bridge can be posed just like the above picture. (With a pickup truck in the shot.)

Posted January 29, 2013, by Nathan Holth (webmaster [at] historicbridges [dot] org)

I think the Parker truss photo belongs on this page:

http://www.bridgehunter.com/ut/washington/53019C/

The listing here is clearly for a pony truss, verified by satellite.

Posted January 29, 2013, by Robert Elder (robertelder1 [at] gmail [dot] com)

The listing says this is a pony truss, but the photograph shows a very nice Parker through truss.

Posted November 9, 2011, by Anonymous

MODERNE/NON-HISTORIQUE!

Posted November 9, 2011, by Anonymous

MODERNE/NON-HISTORIQUE!

Posted October 29, 2011, by Craig Philpott (cphilpott [at] puc [dot] edu)

The historical photos for this bridge, including the original timber bridge photo's give an excellent overview of this location.

Posted October 10, 2011, by Anonymous

Interesting??? Are you kidding??? It is is a friggin MOB!

Posted October 10, 2011, by Anonymous

I agree it belongs here. It's a very interesting and substantial structure. Thanks for posting it. I'd like to be standing on that bridge in a raging storm.

Posted October 7, 2011, by Gene McCluney (gmacfilm [at] live [dot] com)

There are plenty of recent bridges on this site. I have uploaded one myself, because it was a modern bowstring. I don't think you should be too hard on someone who is interested and tries. This is an interesting pedestrian bridge, of truss design, and long. I think it belongs here.

Posted October 7, 2011, by uceb H8R

It is good that anonymous repeated himself, because obviously larry needs all the help he can get.

Posted October 7, 2011, by Anonymous

I ADDED THIS BRIDGE BECAUSE I CAN NOT TELL THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A MODERN BRIDGE AND A HISTORIC ONE.

Posted October 7, 2011, by MARRY LATHEWS

I ADDED THIS BRIDGE BECAUSE I CAN NOT TELL THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A MODERN BRIDGE AND A HISTORIC ONE.

Posted October 7, 2011, by Anonymous

MODERN/NOT HISTORIC!!!

Posted October 7, 2011, by Anonymous

MODERN/NOT HISTORIC!!!

Posted November 25, 2010, by Craig Philpott (cphilpott [at] puc [dot] edu)

This bridge has been on my list of "must photograph" for a long time. I had to go way out of my way on the way to a Thanksgiving feast to get these pictures. This bridge is one of those classic, "I used to cross this when I was a kid" bridges.

Posted November 25, 2010, by Todd D. Walker (mrwalk08 [at] aol [dot] com)

Here is another arch that would cool if painted bright yellow. After a hearty Thanksgiving meal, the "Golden Arches" is very distant on my mind. Mickey D's could have a neat ad campaign idea if a steel rainbow arch that resembles the ones spanning their old time restaurants, would be painted yellow.

Posted January 29, 2009, by Kim Harvey

It wasn't torn down, a child playing with matches accidentally burned it down.

Posted January 29, 2009, by Norene (twoolfarts [at] gotsky [dot] com)

WHY DID THEY TEAR IT DOWN? I DROVE BY THERE YESTERDAY (1-28-2009 AND IT'S GONE.

Posted June 17, 2008, by Randy Brush

It was lost bridge. Damage of fire by arson. We heard from newspaper. Thank you for show photo.