Recent Texas Comments

Post a comment Contact webmaster

Posted March 27, 2017, by Tracy montgomery (tracymontgomery [at] hotmail [dot] com)

Does any one have older pictures of this bridge when it was in use?

Posted March 26, 2017, by Larry Foerster (foerster [at] dfcllp [dot] com)

I serve as the Chairman of the Montgomery County Historical Commission. The old truss bridge was built about 1910 for Montgomery County by the El Paso Bridge and Iron Company. It served as the old Highway 105 bridge spanning the San Jacinto River until the 1930's, but continued to be used by vehicles until the 1960's. The bridge is no doubt targeted for demolition as the adjacent FM 2854 will be widened in a few years. Our Historical Commission is currently working with local officials to find a way to move the iron bridge to another location in a Conroe city park.

Larry Foerster, Chairman


Posted March 24, 2017, by Steve Roberts (acct01 [at] hutofsticks [dot] com)

Photographs #3 is described as the piers of the original bridge. In fact, this is the remains of a low water crossing that was, I believe, installed whilst the replacement bridge was under construction. The piers of the original bridge were constructed from large blocks of granite - many of which (perhaps all) are still lying around in the riverbed beneath the current bridge.

This is an interesting site. Thank you for making all this information available!

Posted March 23, 2017, by Art S. (asuckewer [at] knite [dot] com)
Posted March 5, 2017, by Tony Dillon (spansaver [at] hotmail [dot] com)

My money is on this one!

Posted March 5, 2017, by Dana and Kay Klein

John Yoder, different than this one?

Posted March 5, 2017, by John Yoder (redoynhoj [at] gmail [dot] com)

there is another Cummins Creek Bridge that does not show up on this site that looks like this one but is still open to traffic just off 159 on Willow Springs Rd

Posted March 4, 2017, by Kelly (kellyrshort [at] yahoo [dot] com)

Appears to be on private property.

Posted March 4, 2017, by Anonymous

The photograph is dated 1909.

Posted March 4, 2017, by JWR

The location in the map is actually wrong and is the position of the new bridge built circa 1906. The original bridge was actually not quite 2 miles downstream (to the east)where the original ROW crossed the river valley in a broad left hand curve then ran along the east bank of the Clear Creek.

Posted March 2, 2017, by Julie Bowers (jbowerz1 [at] gmail [dot] com)

Here's the plan. We counted blocks in preparation for ordering. Very excited to do a simple job where it was affordable and will be an asset to the City of Rosebud.

Posted March 2, 2017, by Gil Graham, P.E. (ggraham [at] baileybridge [dot] com)

Great to hear it's been properly done, it's difficult to see what's there in the pics. Kudos to all of you involved it's a beautiful project and piece of history.

Posted March 2, 2017, by Julie Bowers (jbowerz1 [at] gmail [dot] com)

Believe me I thought the same thing for a long time, was it supported on the first verticals, and how could that be! We will take lots of pictures though, and any repairs that might be required when we can visually inspect all of the shoes and lower chord will be made.

Posted March 1, 2017, by Nathan Holth (nathan [at] historicbridges [dot] org)


As Julie mentions, the lower chord is a tension element. In other words, bowstrings (although usually called truss bridges) have a great deal in common with tied arch bridges. Sometimes that are called "arch/truss" bridges as a result. A failed (ie cut) lower chord would likely produce clear visual evidence even to non-engineers. As can be clearly seen in the photos, the bowstring retains its shape and form.

That said, there have been a number of people who have misunderstood the condition of this bridge (usually based on quick judgements using photos and not a site visit) and so I look forward to seeing this bridge project completed.

Posted March 1, 2017, by Julie Bowers (Jbowerz1 [at] gmail [dot] com)

Engineered by our PE on the team. We are putting concrete locking blocks under.

Contracts mean all those details must be covered. Workin' Bridges, BACH Steel and SGI would not be in the business of preserving bridges without attention, these are bridges. We take it very seriously

Look more closely, it's in tension.

Posted March 1, 2017, by Julie Bowers (Jbowerz1 [at] gmail [dot] com)

It just is buried in the dirt a little bit. Yes to engineered.

Posted March 1, 2017, by Gil Graham, P.E. (ggraham [at] baileybridge [dot] com)

Holy Cow. Did they simply cut off the outer bottom chord panels? If so, unless an engineer somewhere analyzed and approved it, I predict it will fall if ever loaded... Someone needs to check into it for the sake of public safety.

Posted March 1, 2017, by Julie Bowers (jbowerz1 [at] gmail [dot] com)

The contracts are signed and this bridge's future is a lift. The BACH Steel Gang will head down to Texas this spring. The Parks Department got a grant and help from EDC of Rosebud to fund this project. I enclose some of the history they provided on where this bridge came from and when.

What started as a bridge hunt and a follow up, ends with a relatively easy fix, if you're Nels, Derek, Lee, Brock, Andy and the rest of the gang.

Posted February 27, 2017, by Cara (Carasholt [at] hotmail [dot] com)

This bridge is on my neighbors property now...he won it at the city auction after it was removed and replaced with new bridge...

Posted February 23, 2017, by Jared Rainer (chumrain [at] att [dot] net)

This bridge has been repaired (at a cost of almost $5 Million) and has been reopened to traffic. Below is a link to a news report confirming this:

Posted February 3, 2017, by Gary Fuqua (Gary [at] fuquaconstruction [dot] com)

Fuqua Construction Co., Inc. Removed this structure in 2006

The Main Span is a 100.1 foot Pony Truss Span Built in 1936.

This Bridge was packaged and shipped to Navasota Texas.

Replicate Plans are now in the process and duplicate structures will be fabricated for shipment.

For Replicate Information Contact;

Gary W. Fuqua

Executive Manager

#Colorado River Draw Bridge

Posted February 3, 2017, by Gary Fuqua (Gary [at] fuquaconstruction [dot] com)

Fuqua Construction Co., Inc. Removed this structure in 1994

The Main Span is a 100.1 foot Pony Truss Span.

Other approach spans total 214 foot of short H-Beam on timber piles and wood deck.

This Bridge was packaged and shipped to Navasota Texas.

Replicate Plans are now in the process and duplicate structures will be fabricated for shipment.

For Replicate Information Contact;

Gary W. Fuqua

Executive Manager

#San Antonio River Bridge

Posted February 1, 2017, by Anonymous

This is an old picture of the bridge as it was before before it was removed and bypassed.

Posted January 26, 2017, by Ja Fehr (jafehr [at] acm [dot] org)

Two minor points.

This line from Austin to Georgetown was abandoned in 1976. Just north of this location, the Katy (MKT) crossed the Missouri Pacific and U.S. Highway 79 via overpasses (both lost).

The Katy did not go "out of business", it was acquired in 1989 by the Missouri Pacific (a subsidiary of the Union Pacific as of 1982) and the Missouri Pacific was merged into the Union Pacific in 1997.

Posted January 26, 2017, by Buddy

A little interesting history behind this bridge:

This is the original "Jakes Bridge." Which is supposedly haunted.

Here is some theories to the "legend" by Texas Escapes:

Being a cotton farmer was not the easiest way to make a living, but if a man didnít mind working from can see to canít, he could get by and maybe save a little.

Texas farmers tilled the black soil to bring forth white fiber, battling the boll weevil and the vagaries of Texas weather to produce a crop each year. But some years, no matter how many hours a man and his family and hired hands put in grubbing and picking, forces beyond his control could suddenly control his life. When the price of cotton went down, all a man could do was hope the market rebounded next year. When it didnít rain enough to keep his plants alive, he could pray for more rain next season, providing it didnít all come at once in a flood.

But as the Depression began to worsen in the early 1930s, cotton didnít come back. In 1929, cotton brought 16.9 cents a pound. Two years later, the price had fallen to less than 6 cents. Many farmers lost their land, their homes and finally, their spirit.

Maybe thatís what made Jake snap. No one seems to know his last name, but many people in Williamson County know about Jake.

For whatever reason, according to the story, Jake killed his wife and two children. When the reality of what he had done set in, he took his own life as well, hanging himself from a back road wooden bridge between Hutto and Pflugerville, near the Williamson-Travis county line.

Thatís one story. Another has Jake being a young man who killed his parents, pushing the car containing their bodies off the rural bridge. Later, this story goes, Jake died in a house fire.

Whoever he was, and if he ever was, Jake seems not to have been a happy person. His spirit, some say, lingers around the bridge (since replaced by a more modern concrete structure) that figures in both versions of the tale.

Posted January 26, 2017, by Buddy (bcrm_1 [at] yahoo [dot] com)

Decking and Asphalt from 50+ years ago

Posted January 26, 2017, by Buddy (bcrm_1 [at] yahoo [dot] com)

Here's some other photos I took of the wooden bridge leading to the Barker Bridge (to help clear up any confusion)

Posted January 26, 2017, by Buddy (bcrm_1 [at] yahoo [dot] com)

The Truss Bridge has not had anything removed. The bridge you see appears to be a Timber Stringer bridge with an asphalt deck on it that crosses a creek on the south side before the Barker Bridge itself.

If you look at the photo, you can see the old road grade leading north. The truss bridge is just around the corner.

This bridge is very old (abandoned since at least the 60s, more than likely, it was abandoned in the early 1950s when Highway 95 was upgraded) and the deck is in very poor condition. I did not try to even walk across it and I would advise anyone from trying to reach the Barker Bridge from the south unless they are looking for this specific bridge.

Posted January 18, 2017, by Roger Mitchell (rmitche1958 [at] gmail [dot] com)

Um, this is not a KCS line (although they have trackage rights). The original line was the Houston and Texas Central, followed in 1917 by the Galveston, Harrisburg and San Antonio railroad parallel to it. Those were both taken over by the Texas and New Orleans (a subsidiary of Southern Pacific) until it was merged into the SP. UP became the owner when they merged with SP.

So the correct owner is UP, along with the other bridges you have listed on the UP Houston Subdivision (Memorial Park, etc).

This also goes for your BH 54379 entry for the Katy Road bridge.


Posted January 12, 2017, by Ian (ian [dot] m [dot] lacour [at] gmail [dot] com)

Despite its appearance, that overpass is used several times per day by KCS. Its the major thoroughfare to the Port of Port Arthur. Thanks and have a great day!

Posted January 5, 2017, by Mike Olson (Mo825641 [at] gmail [dot] com)

We moved there in 1955. The property was owned by the Hancock brothers from Elcampo. We drove cattle across the bridge and also hauled them across in bobtail trucks owned by Emmett Cole Trucking. One time a cotton truck tried to go across it loaded with 3 bales of cotton and didn't make it across. It was still in use in 1970 when we left the ranch. I always heard that the Bass brothers from Victoria built the Swinging Bridge as we called it.

Mike Olson


Posted January 5, 2017, by Jana Powell-Davis (jdavis [at] littlefield [dot] k12 [dot] tx [dot] us)

This wonderful bridge was closed again because the company who restored it did not restore it properly. After two years of fighting with them and it has been reopened to traffic once again. My great-grandfather would walk the rails of that bridge when he was a young boy as did my grandfather and my father! We love that bridge and it has sure helped our community since it has been reopened.

My family helped settle the community of Waldrip and my great-grandfather Joseph E. Powell was the Doctor in the area who delivered most of the children of that era.

Posted December 30, 2016, by J.P. (wildcatjon2000 [at] gmail [dot] com)

I think the pictures that were last uploaded are of a different bridge, just a long shot.

Posted December 16, 2016, by Dana and Kay Klein

Thank you Royce enjoyed this bridge. BOTH halves!

Posted December 11, 2016, by SHANE DEEMER (shanedeemer [at] comcast [dot] net)

Bridge is condemned and the railroad abandoned because of it.

Posted December 4, 2016, by Robert Elder (robertelder1 [at] gmail [dot] com)

Yes, we always appreciate new photos and contributors. Welcome aboard.

Posted December 3, 2016, by Melissa marie (malicious1122 [at] gmail [dot] com)

They took out the pony truss bridge. I have pictures if interested

Posted November 22, 2016, by David Backlin (us71 [at] cox [dot] net)

November 2016: Westbound lanes have been replaced, eastbound lanes currently awaiting replacement.

Posted November 22, 2016, by David Backlin (us71 [at] cox [dot] net)

Northbound lanes appear to be the original bridge and southbound lanes appear to be newer.

Posted November 13, 2016, by Robert Elder (robertelder1 [at] gmail [dot] com)

I have been trying to find out. Texas has a great reputation for preservation, so I suspect that preservation of this NRHP listed structure is likely.

I drove across it a few times in past years, but I saw it today for the first time in a while. I was surprised to see the new bridge in place.

Posted November 13, 2016, by Todd Walker (Twalk4567 [at] aol [dot] com )

Are they gonna knock it down or preserve it for pedestrians

Posted November 13, 2016, by Robert Elder (robertelder1 [at] gmail [dot] com)

This bridge has been closed to traffic. The new bridge is open.

Posted October 8, 2016, by Tim Allman (swngdncr [at] swbell [dot] net)

Loved this bridge ...... here are a couple of HDR Photos

Posted October 7, 2016, by BW

This bridge is set to be rehabbed in 2017 and reopened to traffic upon completion.

Posted September 28, 2016, by Tom Hoffman

I got to visit this bridge on my Texas trip. It is indeed a spectacular structure with the three Whipple truss spans. Its unusual to find a classic bridge of this size over such a small stream. Like in Indiana where I live theres the 330' Moscow covered bridge over the Flatrock which is not a big stream. You'd expect a bridge of this size over rivers like the East Fork White in Indiana or Colorado River in Texas. This is a must see if in the area.

Posted September 15, 2016, by James (Jwwoodham [at] aol [dot] com)

I was looking through the condition reports of the several arch bridges on SW Fwy. that are only 10 -12 years old and seem perfect yet their conditions are not rated highly. I'm no experts but I wonder why they wouldn't achieve higher scores. They have light traffic.

Posted September 9, 2016, by David Galbreath (galbgen1942 [at] yahoo [dot] com)

This bridge was built by C.Q. Horton of Austin, Tx. Not part of Old Pitts Bridge Same Dihedral style but not same builder. The Sugarloaf Bridge has many differences.

Posted August 30, 2016, by Anonymous

Newest Google Streetview shows that this bridge was repaired, not replaced. It is now one-way with a modern steel railing inside the repaired concrete balustrade. The wing walls on the approaches appear to have been replaced and the underside was painted.

Posted August 30, 2016, by Tony Dillon (spansaver [at] hotmail [dot] com)

This one is just crazy!

Verticals are open box-laced, which I have only seen before on a through truss struts.

The endposts and upper chords also seem to feature this on 3 sides with a cover plate on top.

Very unusual and needs to be preserved!

Posted August 29, 2016, by Tom Hoffman

I went to visit this bridge on my Texas trip and found it closed. Don't know why.

Posted July 8, 2016, by Anonymous
Posted July 8, 2016, by Matt Lohry

With an overhead clearance of only 10'-9", I'm wondering why this guy was on this road with a garbage truck anyway--seems to me that even with the arm lowered, it would be a very tight squeeze getting the truck under the bridge. I sure wouldn't try it.

Posted July 8, 2016, by Nathan Holth (webmaster [at] historicbridges [dot] org)

Patrick, Granted I admit it may be a minority of truck drivers who are truly idiots, but I live near the I-69 International Trade Corridor (aka Massive Annoying Truck Route) and I have on numerous occasions nearly been driven off the road into the ditch by truckers unable to stay in their lane because they are half asleep. I have also been involved in hiring a truck and it took about 10 phone calls over two hours to give a trucker directions to a pickup location. No knowledge of GPS coordinates. And I also know from reliable sources who wish to remain anonymous that the process of falsifying logbooks so that trucks can drive longer than is legal (laws intended to protect motorists from truckers not being alert due to fatigue) happens with startling frequency. Like the Walmart trucker who caused a horrible accident with fatalities near Chicago a while back. And of course in their big truck, these truck drivers who cause these fatal accidents get to walk away without injury.

So yeah stereotypes may be inappropriate (like any stereotype) but these sorts of incidents still suggest that there is something wrong with "the system" as these things should NEVER happen. Once is too much.

Posted July 7, 2016, by Nathan Holth (nathan [at] historicbridges [dot] org)

Yeah and never assume a truck driver has a brain. The only requirement to be a truck driver is that you have a pulse. Brain is optional.

Posted July 7, 2016, by Robert Elder (robertelder1 [at] gmail [dot] com)

That is awful. Never take life for granted.

Posted July 7, 2016, by Roger Deschner (rogerdeschner [at] gmail [dot] com)

Yet another perfectly good bridge damaged by a careless truck driver, killing a 12-year old child and injuring her mother who was driving. Apparently that trash hauling company has had a poor safety record.

Story at KPRC-TV of Houston

Posted June 30, 2016, by Ja Fehr (jafehr [at] acm [dot] org)

Fantastic, I have been waiting for years for this.

Please check out

for additional photographs from an 1892 Phoenix Bridge Company book on the construction sequence.

Posted June 22, 2016, by Lowell McManus (lgm [at] wildblue [dot] net)

This bridge, closed since flood damage on June 3, is now repaired and reopened to rail traffic as of June 22.

Posted June 19, 2016, by Jonathan Fosburgh (jonathan [at] fosburgh [dot] org)

Confirm, this bridge is closed to traffic. All traffic on business 59 has been diverted to the adjacent structure

Posted June 7, 2016, by Justin Anderson

I can't figure out how to edit a post. It sounds like the "bridge collapse" might of been someone taking words out of context after hearing about the bridge closing/foundation shifting? From what I gather the bridge is still standing. Sorry about that..

Posted June 7, 2016, by Justin Anderson

I've heard that the bridge collapsed last night?

Posted June 6, 2016, by Annette Kovar (abkovar [at] sbcglobal [dot] net)

One more photo. Inspectors on the bridge.

Posted June 6, 2016, by Annette Kovar (abkovar [at] sbcglobal [dot] net)

This bridge is not open! It has been damaged by the flood. One of the supports dropped a couple feet.

Posted June 6, 2016, by Mike bourbon (bigmike1911a1 [at] gmail [dot] com)

Information is incorrect bridge is on former TN&O or Southern Pacific Glidden subdivision , now Union Pacific

Posted June 1, 2016, by Jason Straub

Still no vehicular access as of May 2016.

Posted May 17, 2016, by aaron leibold (aaron [dot] mightypenguin [at] gmail [dot] com)

David Box in 'Elm Fork Echos' of May 1993 described a tour from Dallas to Denton which had been published in the 1913 issue of the Dallas Auto Club tour guide. In reconstructing the route he concluded that west of Hebron the route utilized Highway 544 and then turned northwest to a bridge over the Elm Fork and entered Lewisville on College Street. A current topographic map of the area shows an unimproved road from College Street that crosses the river and joins Highway 121. We can see no evidence of that road today but the area east of the river is overgrown with grass and brush and the area to the west is part of the Lewisville landfill. Both piers at the location are constructed from quarried stone and mortar. The pier shown in Figure 1 is on the west bank of the river and about 50 feet from the river. Near the base it is about 18 feet wide and 6 feet thick, it is about 12 feet high with sloping sides. The other pier is on the east side of the river and at the waters edge as shown in Figure 2. The eastern pier has a rectangular base 17 feet wide and 10 feet thick. The sides slope gradually above the base. An earthen ramp and several wooden piles remain to the east of the pier.

James Polser of Lewisville remembers the bridge from the forties or fifties on the road from Lewisville to McKinney. He recalls a bridge with a ramp at each end and with a steel superstructure

Posted May 16, 2016, by Michael Farris (michaelfarris71 [at] gmail [dot] com)

Does anybody know the story on this bridge. If so contact me through my email and or cell 214-498/7983

Posted May 12, 2016, by Shelley Williams (jswilliams [at] centex [dot] net)

Love the history of this bridge. My mother was named after her. We are family.

Posted May 9, 2016, by Andy Peters (anpete1971 [at] gmail [dot] com)
Posted April 29, 2016, by Steve A (webmaster [at] alpsroads [dot] net)

Bridge is now closed to vehicular traffic. Still open to bikes/peds. West approach closed off at Metcalfe St., recommend parking at east approach for quicker access. No convenient side view except from Ave. L bridge north sidewalk.

Posted April 27, 2016, by Wade Pitcher (wpitcher1 [at] gmail [dot] com)

This Bridge has major damage from 2015 floods.

Posted April 27, 2016, by Wade Pitcher (wpitcher1 [at] gmail [dot] com)

Felt sorry for old bridge so cleaned up most of the debris on top of the bridge.

Posted April 16, 2016, by Tony Dillon (spansaver [at] hotmail [dot] com)

Doesn't sound like they are planning to replace it from the article.

Posted April 16, 2016, by David Backlin (us71 [at] cox [dot] net)

Bridge is closed intil TXDOT can affect repairs

Posted March 31, 2016, by Scott (navylife59 [at] yahoo [dot] com)

Used to travel under that bridge many times going to the Garland Dump, the Garland auto impound lot (operated by my Uncle) and to Rowlett. Road was always crap but the bridge was always a narrow treat. There is a sister bridge like it further down the line in Rowlett.

Posted March 13, 2016, by Wilson White (wwhite678 [at] yahoo [dot] com)

Worst flood ever on March 12, 2016 brought the flood waters above the bridge. Not sure if she'll ever be back in service.

Posted March 9, 2016, by Brad Smith (gaberdine [at] hotmail [dot] com)
Posted March 2, 2016, by Luke

The replacement bridge was constructed between 1956 and 1959.

Спасибо for the postcard.

Posted March 2, 2016, by Oleg Nesterov (mostovik29 [at] yandex [dot] ru)


tell me please, when Corpus Christi Channel Bridge (Old) was demolition? I have a post card about this bridge and can give you scan




Posted February 21, 2016, by James McCray (jamesinslocomb [at] yahoo [dot] com)

I dont believe that I found this!! Now what kind of Bowstring is this?

Posted February 19, 2016, by Anonymous (k-dwhitehead [at] comcast [dot] net)

Alternate photo of Columbus, TX UP Railroad bridge. Taken in 2002.

Posted February 19, 2016, by Ann Keen (ann [dot] keen [at] hdrinc [dot] com)

The purpose of this posting is to solicit comments from the public on the proposed replacement of the BNSF bridge over the West Fork and its potential impact on historic properties. All comments must be received by February 29, 2016 in order to be taken into consideration.

BNSF is proposing to replace its bridge at Mile Post 348.57, which is the westernmost of the ďThree SistersĒ rail bridges over the West Fork of the Trinity River near Samuels Avenue in Fort Worth. The area of potential effects (APE) is a one-quarter mile radius around the bridge, which incorporates both direct and indirect (visual) effects. Within this APE, there are four historic resources eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP): the three rail bridges (including BNSF Bridge 348.57) and the Fort Worth Floodway.

Regarding BNSF Bridge 348.57, this resource would be subject to adverse effect, as the undertaking includes demolition of the existing bridge.

Regarding the two rail bridges east of BNSF Bridge 348.57, their character-defining features that make them eligible for the NRHP would remain unaffected. While the undertaking will impact their viewshed, their viewshed is not what makes them eligible.

Regarding the Fort Worth Floodway, the undertaking will not impact any character-defining features of the resource (levee system with associated dams, sumps, sluices, and water gauges). The 1995 reconstruction of the Samuels Avenue Bridge just west of BNSF Bridge 348.57 represents a recent project that did not adversely affect the NRHP eligibility of the Floodway.

All public comments received by February 29, 2016 will be considered in developing an agreement with the Texas Historical Commission and other agencies to mitigate the loss of the bridge.

If you would like more information on the project and its potential impact on historic properties, please contact Ann Keen, architectural historian at HDR, Inc., at Thank you.

Posted February 2, 2016, by ArtS (asuckewer [at] knite [dot] com)
Posted January 19, 2016, by John Riley (JRiley [at] sonomamarintrain [dot] org)

Clarification appreciated Jeffrey! SMART ended up with both plansets and the history of the 1980's bridge replacement was not clear - appeared that much of the original planset was re-used. The Galveston Causeway, now Haystack Landing, bridge is currently finishing commissioning and operating very well.

Posted January 18, 2016, by David Galbreath (galbgen1942 [at] yahoo [dot] com)

This Brushy Creek Pratt Thru Truss Bridge was moved across Milam County on back roads to Wilson-Ledbetter Park and was put across the lake there in 1999.

Posted January 17, 2016, by David Galbreath (galbgen1942 [at] yahoo [dot] com)

The Hog Creek Bridge is still over Hog Creek. It is a Pratt Thru Truss Bridge on CR 278. It was bypass in 2004 with a Cement Slab Bridge. I have pictures of the Old bridge and the Cement Bridge.

Posted January 16, 2016, by Kevin Mackey (ar8jason [at] hotmail [dot] com)

This bridge is scheduled for replacement. It is planned to be moved to a city park in Three Rivers, Texas.

Posted January 8, 2016, by M C Toyer (mctoyer [at] hotmail [dot] com)

Photo of the 1939 bridge under construction with the original 1901 bridge still in place.

Source / Caption:

The Knox County Historical Commission hosted a historical bridge marker dedication on Saturday, October 17th.

The ceremony was on the south side of the Brazos River Bridge on SH 6 between Benjamin and Knox City. The bridge was constructed in 1938-1939 to replace the original truss bridge built in 1901. It is one of only four of its type built in Texas and the design of what engineers call the ďtop cordĒ is unique in the state. The bridge project was officially completed on March 16, 1939, at a cost of about $138,000. It is listed in the National Bridge Registry.

Posted December 22, 2015, by Steve Quarrella (fishpope [at] iname [dot] com)

The Brazos River Bridge was taken out of service for vehicular traffic in 2014, but it is still in service as a pedestrian bridge, with a 2015 Texas Historical Marker at the south end.

Posted December 19, 2015, by ArtS (asuckewer [at] knite [dot] com)
Posted December 12, 2015, by Tom (Dryflyshaman [at] gmail [dot] com)

that is one of the old FM 1988 Bridge supports.

I do not remember what exact year the concrete Bridge replaced the old steel bridge.

If you go upstream from there around the next bend you will find old wooden pilings for what I always understood was a railroad bridge.

Posted December 6, 2015, by Jeffrey Routson (jroutson [at] hardesty-hanover [dot] com)

Clarification: The original 1912 bascule was designed by the Scherzer Rolling Lift Bridge Company. It was a 3-track, single-leaf span located on the north channel pier (by the 1980s only a single track was in service). The 1912 bascule was replaced in 1987 with a single-track, single-leaf rolling lift bascule. It was located on the south channel pier so that it could be constructed while the original bascule remained in service. After the new bascule was completed, the 1912 bascule was raised and secured in the open position and the new bascule was put into service. The 1912 bascule was then demolished. The new bascule was designed by American Bridge Division of US Steel (Chicago Engineering Office), fabricated by PDM Bridge (Orange TX Plant), and erected by American Bridge Company.

Posted December 4, 2015, by David Backlin (us71 [at] cox [dot] net)

A temporary replacement has been built in its place:

Posted November 21, 2015, by ben fly (benfly [at] earthlink [dot] net)

Photo shows a Works Progress Administration built bridge

(1930s). In Roxton Texas between Sunset and Market streets. Railroad was Santa Fe's Dallas - Paris line.

Posted November 21, 2015, by M C Toyer (mctoyer [at] hotmail [dot] com)

This bridge and the through truss to the east were on the old Texas Central / MKT Railroad, not a highway. Both are on private property and have been converted to a ranch road.

Posted November 21, 2015, by M C Toyer (mctoyer [at] hotmail [dot] com)

This bridge and the pony truss to the west were on the old Texas Central / MKT Railroad, not a highway. Both are on private property and have been converted to a ranch road.

Posted November 6, 2015, by M C Toyer (mctoyer [at] hotmail [dot] com)

Albert -

That bridge has a long history of destruction, damage and repair.

The derailment was in the mid 1950s (I have a detailed account and photos) and damaged the southernmost through truss which was replaced by the pair of deck plate girders there now. The girders have a builder's plate dated 1911. I don't know where they were originally but from about 1940 to 1955 were located on Shawnee Creek on the now abandoned spur used in construction Denison Dam and the powerhouse.

The debris below the northernmost through truss was from attempt to prevent the bridge washing away in a major flood in 1915 where several cars were loaded with coal and placed on the bridge.

In the spring of 1908 the three southernmost through trusses were completely destroyed by flooding and replaced by the mismatched set, only two of which now remain. The two northernmost through trusses survived the 1908 flood but the concrete piers and northernmost abutment were rebuilt about 1916/17. There is a date embossed on the underside.

At low water you can see the cut stones of the original piers.

The original bridge was completed in 1872 and I have a couple of photos attributed to it. About 1890 it was completely rebuilt and raised several feet.

Posted November 4, 2015, by Albert Johnston (asjohnston3 [at] gmail [dot] com)

I stopped to photograph this bridge in late October of this year. (2015) I spoke to a Union Pacific employee who happened to be their with a crew doing track maintenance. He told me that there had been a major accident - derailment on the bridge many years ago that had caused major damage to the bridge and had even resulted in several railroad cars falling into the river. He even pointed out to me what he said were the remains of one of the cars.I am interested in finding any information about this accident...

Posted October 25, 2015, by Patrick Feller (nakrnsm [at] aol [dot] com)

The photos shown are of the FM 457 bridge:

I know because I took them.

Posted September 30, 2015, by Shannon

Thank you!!