Photos 

< Previous   (1 of 29)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

< Previous   (2 of 29)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

< Previous   (3 of 29)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

< Previous   (4 of 29)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

< Previous   (5 of 29)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

< Previous   (6 of 29)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View high-res version

< Previous   (7 of 29)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

< Previous   (8 of 29)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

< Previous   (9 of 29)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View high-res version

< Previous   (10 of 29)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

< Previous   (11 of 29)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

< Previous   (12 of 29)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

< Previous   (13 of 29)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

< Previous   (14 of 29)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

< Previous   (15 of 29)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

< Previous   (16 of 29)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View high-res version

< Previous   (17 of 29)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View high-res version

< Previous   (18 of 29)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View high-res version

< Previous   (19 of 29)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View high-res version

< Previous   (20 of 29)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View high-res version

< Previous   (21 of 29)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View high-res version

< Previous   (22 of 29)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View high-res version

< Previous   (23 of 29)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View high-res version

< Previous   (24 of 29)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

< Previous   (25 of 29)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View high-res version

< Previous   (26 of 29)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View high-res version

< Previous   (27 of 29)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

< Previous   (28 of 29)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

< Previous   (29 of 29)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View high-res version

Facts 

Overview
Lost cantilevered through truss over Brazos River on US 90A at Richmond
Location
Fort Bend County, Texas
Status
Removed
History
Opened July 23, 1925; parallel bridge built 1965; closed to traffic Nov. 1986; demolished July 14, 1988
Builders
- Austin Bridge Co. of Dallas, Texas
- Charles H. Kendall
- Missouri Valley Bridge & Iron Co. of Leavenworth, Kansas
- Virginia Bridge & Iron Co.
Design
Cantilevered through truss
Dimensions
Length of largest span: 364 ft.
Total length: 1,156 ft.
Deck width: 20 ft.
Inventory number
BH 36688 (Bridgehunter.com ID)

Update Log 

  • June 10, 2008: New photos from Historic American Engineering Record

Sources 

  • Historic American Engineering Record