Rating:
3 votes

CSX Cumberland Swing Bridge

Share:

Photos 

Photo taken by Calvin Sneed in November 2010

Enlarge

Map 

Street Views 

Facts 

Overview
Camelback through truss bridge over Cumberland River on CSX Railroad in downtown Nashville
Location
Nashville, Davidson County, Tennessee
Status
Open to traffic
History
Built 1916 by the Fort Pitt Bridge Works to handle N.C. & St. L's Louisville to Birmingham line (bypass bridge 7 miles upriver)
Builder
- Fort Pitt Bridge Works of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Design
Camelback through truss swing main span and two Camelback through truss approach spans
Approximate latitude, longitude
+36.17152, -86.77847   (decimal degrees)
36°10'17" N, 86°46'43" W   (degrees°minutes'seconds")
Approximate UTM coordinates
16/519922/4002995 (zone/easting/northing)
USGS topographic map
Nashville West
Inventory number
BH 46817 (Bridgehunter.com ID)

Update Log 

  • October 31, 2012: Updated by J.P.: corrected Location
  • November 8, 2010: Added by Calvin Sneed

Sources 

  • Calvin Sneed - us43137415 [at] yahoo [dot] com
  • J.P. - wildcatjon2000 [at] gmail [dot] com

Comments 

CSX Cumberland Swing Bridge
Posted January 30, 2013, by Don Morrison

The Railfanning link is referring to a swing bridge at Clarksville, not Nashville.

CSX Cumberland Swing Bridge
Posted January 29, 2013, by Chris Wage (cwage [at] quietlife [dot] net)

Yeah, you guys are right -- also, I'm an idiot, since the original wooden bridge burned down in 1864, so that makes no sense.

Looks like those sources are either wrong or they are referring to a different bridge..

CSX Cumberland Swing Bridge
Posted January 29, 2013, by Matt Lohry

Chris,

The technology associated with this bridge and its design was not available until around 1900, so I think that the build date shown is correct. This bridge is most likely a replacement for the bridge that was built in 1859. This is definitely a post-1900 truss design.

CSX Cumberland Swing Bridge
Posted January 29, 2013, by Nathan Holth (form3 [at] historicbridges [dot] org)

The truss spans of this bridge stylistically date to the 20th Century. The 1916 date seems appropriate. Trusses with members this massive and with riveted connections were not built in 1859. Very few railroad truss bridges built before 1880 exist today because they were not strong enough to handle increasing loads.

CSX Cumberland Swing Bridge
Posted January 29, 2013, by Chris Wage (cwage [at] quietlife [dot] net)

Hey guys,

I am finding numerous references claiming that this bridge was built in 1859, not 1916.

As it replaced the original wooden structure burned in the civil war, this seems much more likely, unless the bridge was not replaced for over 50 years.

References:

http://railfanning.org/2009/11/historic-trestle-a-landmark-in-its-own-right/

"Nashville Then and Now" also makes reference to an 1859 build date.

Thoughts?

CSX Cumberland Swing Bridge
Posted March 6, 2011, by Anthony Dillon (spansaver [at] hotmail [dot] com)

My pleasure MP!

CSX Cumberland Swing Bridge
Posted March 6, 2011, by Mike Page (mike [dot] page [at] hotmail [dot] com)

Thank you again for you help, Anthony. All done, t'is right here.

http://bridgehunter.com/tn/davidson/bh48374/

CSX Cumberland Swing Bridge
Posted March 6, 2011, by Anthony Dillon (spansaver [at] hotmail [dot] com)

Mike, as long as it's separated by land between the 2 structures you would consider it to be individual.

Here is an example of a 2 span bridge (1 structure) over a stream and a short land separation followed by a plate girder over a roadway that is another structure:

http://bridgehunter.com/in/marion/fall-river-creek/

http://bridgehunter.com/in/marion/bh39071/

You should add a new page for the little girder bridge and post your pics to it! :)

CSX Cumberland Swing Bridge
Posted March 6, 2011, by Mike Page (mike [dot] page [at] hotmail [dot] com)

I have a question, that may be either technical or opinion. I was wandering around Nashville this morning, taking pictures of this n' that, and discovered that approximately 100' from this bridge, the railroad crosses 1st Ave. on the little bridge I've attached a photo of. This bridge was built by the same company at the same time. So, does it count as a separate bridge, or a stand-alone one?

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, JFIF standard 1.01, 607806 bytes