News

Everything you know about the Royal Gorge Bridge is wrong

The owners of the Royal Gorge Bridge in Colorado have made a lot of money from tourists visiting the "highest bridge in the world" and staring down at the Arkansas River 1,053 feet below.

Except that the bridge isn't 1,053 feet high. And it's no longer the world's highest bridge. It's not even second.

Eric Sakowski of HighestBridges.com ranks the Royal Gorge Bridge as the 11th highest bridge in the world, although three of the bridges are under construction and haven't been completed yet.

The Royal Gorge Bridge quietly lost its title in 2001 thanks to a massive highway building program in China. It was first trumped by the Liuguanghe Bridge at 975 ft. high. Last year, on Nov. 15th, the Siduhe River Bridge opened and set the new world record at 1,550 ft. high.

Meanwhile, despite the tourist brochures stating otherwise, the Royal Gorge is not over a thousand feet high. The exact figure is still open to debate, but is well short of the 1,053 figure that everybody knows. Using a laser rangefinder, Eric Sakowski measured the height of the deck above the Arkansas River as 955 ft. Walt Lambert, engineer for the bridge's rehabilitation in 1983-84, reported a height of 968.4 ft.

After hearing about the HighestBridges.com website, officials at Royal Gorge recently took their own measurements and came up with a figure of 969 ft. I bet they aren't too thrilled about this revelation. The Colorado Springs Gazette quotes a spokeswoman for the bridge saying that the 1,053 figure was probably measured to the top of the towers. She said, "As far as we know, we're sticking with our 1,053 feet over the river."

However, if "height to the top of the towers" is the accepted measurement, then this means that the Royal Gorge is still trumped by another bridge, the Millau Viaduct in France with one tower rising over 1,100 feet.

I must confess a certain amount of glee about the Royal Gorge Bridge getting its comeuppance. I refuse to pay $24 per person just to visit a bridge, even if the ticket includes admission to other attractions. Come to think of it, Royal Gorge might hold the record as the world's most expensive toll bridge.

The height isn't the only problem with the bridge's reported measurements. During the 1980s rehabilitation, Walt Lambert discovered that the length of the main span was actually longer than everyone thought. The span length had always been accepted as 880 feet, a figure that the original designer, George Cole, had used in a 1930 article about the bridge.

The actual measurement is 938 feet, a number confirmed by Eric Sakowski using a rangefinder and then later by spot-checking with a tape measure.

Reportedly, George Cole's brother performed the original site survey and erroneously measured a distance of 880 feet between the proposed towers. The error wasn't discovered until after the towers were built. Cole covered for his brother and pretended that the length was 880 feet. In order to pay for the extra decking required by the longer span, it was necessary to fudge the accounting numbers and add bogus cost overruns to the steel used in the towers.

It's amazing that Cole was able to maintain the cover-up for so long, but nobody had any reason to question him. He built the darn thing, after all.

Now that the Royal Gorge Bridge has been scrutinized, I wonder what other famous bridges harbor engineering secrets? Has anybody independently verified the length of the Lake Pontchartrain Causeway?

Comments  (7)

Everything you know about the Royal Gorge Bridge is wrong
Posted March 4, 2010, by Anthony Dillon (spansaver [at] hotmail [dot] com)

I have to agree with Nathan. As a truss bridge enthusiast, I would much rather see the Costilla Crossing Bridge.. for free (and perhaps donate a few bucks to help them maintain it).

Would also check out the Nineteenth Street Bridge in Denver!

http://bridgehunter.com/co/denver/nineteenth/

Everything you know about the Royal Gorge Bridge is wrong
Posted March 4, 2010, by Patrick S. O'Donnell (1 [dot] 991km [at] comcast [dot] net)

It is very bothersome to me that the Royal Gorge is sticking with the 1,053 figure because that is the height of the towers above the water. I demand they then move thier 1,053 signs to the tower summit and allow folks to go up there as they're paying $$ to experience being that far up. Then again, you would only be a few hundred feet off the ground at best. Assuming the Siduhe's towers are about 1/10 the mainspan, then the height of the tower above water is ~1,850 feet as compared to Royal Gorges now insignificant 1,053 feet. In addition the Royal Gorge must put an end to it's claim of World's Highest Bridge. To think that when standing at mid span of the Royal Gorge Bridge you would have to look up 60 storeys to the underside of the Siduhe Bridge. Give credit where it is due. We've been lied too about the Royal Gorge for years while they keep collecting $$. For further proof of the Royal Gorge being well less than the 1,053 feet, one needs to look no further than the USGS Topo Maps for the Royal Gorge area. You'll see that the abutments of the bridge are located between the 6440 & 6480 contour lines. With the bridge intersecting with the river between the 5520 & 5560 contour lines. Just taking the higher possible abutment contour of 6480 away from the lower of the river crossing contour lines of 5520 gives a 960 foot maximum difference.

Everything you know about the Royal Gorge Bridge is wrong
Posted March 4, 2010, by Jason Smith (JDSmith77 [at] gmx [dot] net)

I think $24 just to cross the bridge is way over the top. Despite the controversy over the title of being the highest bridge in the world, which is not anymore, thanks to the Millau Viaduct, the only reason for visiting the bridge would be its construction as a suspension bridge. Otherwise, I would choose the Millau Viaduct anyday. Imagine if the toll on that bridge was 24 EUR (about $30)? The French would go mad saying "Vouz et fou?!!" (Are you nuts!?!)

Everything you know about the Royal Gorge Bridge is wrong
Posted March 4, 2010, by Nathan Holth (form3 [at] historicbridges [dot] org)

Agreed, much more to see in Colorado. If I am in Colorado, I am headed straight to the Costilla Crossing Bridge: http://bridgehunter.com/co/conejos/costilla/

Everything you know about the Royal Gorge Bridge is wrong
Posted March 4, 2010, by Robert Elder (robertelder1 [at] gmail [dot] com)

Colorado has many historic bridges that can be visited for free! I have always chosen to bypass this one.

Everything you know about the Royal Gorge Bridge is wrong
Posted March 3, 2010, by Craig Philpott (cphilpott [at] puc [dot] edu)

Yes, paying the requested fee for this private attraction was too much for my stomach and for my early morning visit for sunrise photos I paid nothing by staying on the cliffs near the parking lot and completing the entire exercise before staff and tourist arrived.