Rating:
No votes cast

Indianola Avenue - Iuka Ravine Arch Bridge

Photos 

Photo taken by Calvin Sneed in April 2010

Enlarge

BH Photo #161175

Map 

Description 

According to the plaques in the photos, the bridge shown was built in 1996 to replace a similar historic bridge.

Facts 

Overview
Closed spandrel concrete arch bridge over Iuka Ravine on Indianola Avenue
Location
Franklin County, Ohio
Status
Open to traffic
History
Built 1996 to replace similar bridge built in 1912
Design
Closed-spandrel arch
Recognition
Posted to the National Register of Historic Places
Approximate latitude, longitude
+40.00421, -83.00299   (decimal degrees)
40°00'15" N, 83°00'11" W   (degrees°minutes'seconds")
Approximate UTM coordinates
17/329029/4430145 (zone/easting/northing)
Quadrangle map:
Northwest Columbus
Inventory numbers
ODOT 2561433 (Ohio Dept. of Transportation structure file number)
BH 27563 (Bridgehunter.com ID)

Categories 

Arch (11,199)
Built 1996 (50)
Built during 1990s (564)
Closed-spandrel arch (3,608)
Concrete balustrade (669)
Deck arch (10,437)
Franklin County, Ohio (88)
Modern (1,668)
NR-listed (2,844)
Ohio (2,918)
Open (36,593)
Owned by city (4,491)

Update Log 

  • December 11, 2011: Updated by Clark Vance: Update to reflect the fact that this is a replacement for an older, historic bridge.
  • December 10, 2011: Updated by J.P.: updated location

Sources 

  • Calvin Sneed - us43137415 [at] yahoo [dot] com
  • J.P. - wildcatjon2000 [at] gmail [dot] com
  • Clark Vance - cvance [at] dogmail [dot] com

Comments 

Indianola Avenue - Iuka Ravine Arch Bridge
Posted December 12, 2011, by Nathan Holth (form3 [at] historicbridges [dot] org)

Normally, a bridge that is replaced should be removed from the NRHP. Sometimes however the SHPO and Keeper are slow to make this removal, but regardless the bridge SHOULD be removed since NRHP requires a most bridges to be over 50 years of age.

Indianola Avenue - Iuka Ravine Arch Bridge
Posted December 11, 2011, by Clark Vance (cvance [at] dogmail [dot] com)

I have updated this one to show that the photos are of a replacement. The question is, is the new bridge on the NRHP or was this only true of the old?