Photos 

< Previous   (1 of 37)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View photos at Library of Congress

< Previous   (2 of 37)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View photos at Library of Congress

< Previous   (3 of 37)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View photos at Library of Congress

< Previous   (4 of 37)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View photos at Library of Congress

< Previous   (5 of 37)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View photos at Library of Congress

< Previous   (6 of 37)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View photos at Library of Congress

< Previous   (7 of 37)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View photos at Library of Congress

< Previous   (8 of 37)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View photos at Library of Congress

< Previous   (9 of 37)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View photos at Library of Congress

< Previous   (10 of 37)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View photos at Library of Congress

< Previous   (11 of 37)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View photos at Library of Congress

< Previous   (12 of 37)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View photos at Library of Congress

< Previous   (13 of 37)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View photos at Library of Congress

< Previous   (14 of 37)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View photos at Library of Congress

< Previous   (15 of 37)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View photos at Library of Congress

< Previous   (16 of 37)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View photos at Library of Congress

< Previous   (17 of 37)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View photos at Library of Congress

< Previous   (18 of 37)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View photos at Library of Congress

< Previous   (19 of 37)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View photos at Library of Congress

< Previous   (20 of 37)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View photos at Library of Congress

< Previous   (21 of 37)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View photos at Library of Congress

< Previous   (22 of 37)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View photos at Library of Congress

< Previous   (23 of 37)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View photos at Library of Congress

< Previous   (24 of 37)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View photos at Library of Congress

< Previous   (25 of 37)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View photos at Library of Congress

< Previous   (26 of 37)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View photos at Library of Congress

< Previous   (27 of 37)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View photos at Library of Congress

< Previous   (28 of 37)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View photos at Library of Congress

< Previous   (29 of 37)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View photos at Library of Congress

< Previous   (30 of 37)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View photos at Library of Congress

< Previous   (31 of 37)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View photos at Library of Congress

< Previous   (32 of 37)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View photos at Library of Congress

< Previous   (33 of 37)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View photos at Library of Congress

< Previous   (34 of 37)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View photos at Library of Congress

< Previous   (35 of 37)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View photos at Library of Congress

< Previous   (36 of 37)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View photos at Library of Congress

< Previous   (37 of 37)   Next >

Hisotoric photo

Historic photo from 1896, shows bridge as railroad bridge before being converted for automobile use in 1951.

Photo posted by Max Johnson

Map 

Vicinity Map

Vicinity map

Map links:

Timeline 

Compiled by James Baughn

1887
Opened to railroad traffic
1951
Converted for automobile use
1953
Acquired by Kansas City
Mar. 2, 2001
Permanently closed to traffic
Dec. 5, 2001
Main span imploded
Dec. 17, 2001
Replacement bridge opened

Facts 

Overview
Lost three-span Whipple truss bridge over the Missouri River in Kansas City
Status
Replaced by new bridge in 2001
History
Built 1887; converted into vehicular use in 1951; demolished in 2001
Builders
- Charles L. Strobel
- Keystone Bridge Works
Design
Whipple through truss
Dimensions
Length of largest span: 403.8 ft.
Total length: 1,358.6 ft.
Deck width: 20.0 ft.
Vertical clearance above deck: 18.5 ft.
Approximate latitude, longitude
+39.14604, -94.53402   (decimal degrees)
39°08'46" N, 94°32'02" W   (degrees°minutes'seconds")
Approximate UTM coordinates
15/367436/4334103 (zone/easting/northing)
Land survey
T. 50 N., R. 33 W., Sec. 7
USGS topographic map
North Kansas City
Inventory number
BH 21692 (Bridgehunter.com ID)

Update Log 

  • July 26, 2008: New photos from James Baughn
  • June 8, 2008: Updated by Max Johnson

Sources 

  • HAER MO-93 - Francois Chouteau Bridge, Spanning Missouri River at Chouteau Traffic Way, Kansas City, Jackson County, MO
  • James Baughn - webmaster [at] bridgehunter [dot] com

Comments 

Chouteau Bridge
Posted June 21, 2009, by Robert Elder (robertelder1 [at] gmail [dot] com)

I had considered this to be one of the finest truss bridges in the entire United States and one of the landmarks of Kansas City.

There was much fear that this bridge was unsafe, and the weight limit had been lowered to three tons. For some residents of the KC area, it was considered "fun" to drive unsuspecting friends and family across this bridge.

Chouteau Bridge
Posted June 20, 2009, by Anthony Dillon (spansaver [at] hotmail [dot] com)

This was an amazing structure! Just looking at pictures makes me wish I had seen the real thing. I have not seen circular, cut stone cassions on any other bridge. You have to wonder just what is wrong with people who would replace a gem like this.