Rating:
1 vote

Salt Creek CR 213 Bridge

Photos 

North Approach

Looking South

Photo taken by Neil Krout in September 2021

Enlarge

BH Photo #507635

Facts 

Overview
Steel Stringer bridge over Salt Creek on CR 213
Location
Chariton County, Missouri
Status
Open to traffic
History
Built ca. 1960
Design
Steel stringer
Dimensions
Length of largest span: 34.1 ft.
Total length: 37.0 ft.
Deck width: 16.7 ft.
Approximate latitude, longitude
+39.54126, -93.05311   (decimal degrees)
39°32'29" N, 93°03'11" W   (degrees°minutes'seconds")
Approximate UTM coordinates
15/495436/4376845 (zone/easting/northing)
Quadrangle map:
Indian Grove
Land survey
T. 55 N., R. 19 W., Sec. 29
Average daily traffic (as of 2016)
20
Inventory numbers
MO 021-236002.1 (Missouri off-system bridge number)
MONBI 19845 (Missouri bridge number on the National Bridge Inventory)
BH 21242 (Bridgehunter.com ID)
Inspection report (as of September 2018)
Overall condition: Fair
Superstructure condition rating: Satisfactory (6 out of 9)
Substructure condition rating: Fair (5 out of 9)
Deck condition rating: Satisfactory (6 out of 9)
Sufficiency rating: 58.8 (out of 100)
View more at BridgeReports.com

Categories 

Beam (16,888)
Built during 1960s (2,150)
Chariton County, Missouri (121)
Missouri (6,563)
One-lane traffic (7,837)
Open (40,969)
Owned by county (21,612)
Span length 25-50 feet (16,225)
Steel stringer (6,712)
Total length 25-50 feet (11,506)

Update Log 

  • September 18, 2021: New photos from Neil Krout

Sources 

  • Neil Krout - kickinpony [dot] 66 [at] gmail [dot] com

Comments 

Salt Creek CR 213 Bridge
Posted September 18, 2021, by Clark Vance (cvance [at] dogmail [dot] com)

NBI calls it a steel deck truss. Might be less disappointing than you thought.

Salt Creek CR 213 Bridge
Posted September 18, 2021, by Neil Krout (kickinpony [dot] 66 [at] gmail [dot] com)

Changed description from Pony-Truss to Steel Stringer.

Salt Creek CR 213 Bridge
Posted September 18, 2021, by Neil Krout (kickinpony [dot] 66 [at] gmail [dot] com)

I went to this bridge today, because there were no prior photos of this bridge, on the website. Imagine my disappointment, when it wasn't a Pony-Truss Bridge.