Photo taken by Alexander D. Mitchell IV in April 2013
It seems the only factual error is the date of 1910; about 32 years before Donald Bailey designed his namesake truss. The rehab date of 1973 apparently is the date the Bailey truss replaced the 1910 bridge.
The bridge is 40 years old, and you've photo documented it. Perhaps it is best to not remove this entry.
....Or did you nominate the bridge itself for removal? They could put in a nice UCEB here. 8^)
As should be plainly obvious from the photo, there is no way the current structure dates to 1910. The locals I talked to believe this bridge replaced a bridge washed out in Tropical Storm Agnes in 1972, and the National Bridge Index never noted the new construction of what was supposed to be a temporary structure. I nominate this for removal.