agrees with Anthony.
I think I can speak for the majority here Will when I say that it is fine to make changes to help portray the most accurate information. Much of the bulk data presented on this site has errors and omitions which many of the regular contributors have worked to correct. Bridgehunter is a constantly evolving work in progress.
dude go for it, i was adding information to the bridge based on what i found on a random website about the bridge. No worry about stepping on my toes. Would have answered sooner but been on a retreat with our youth group this weekend.
Being a relatively new "editor" here, I'm not entirely sure of proper protocol -
I'd been putting together a listing for the Gilpin's. I know every inch of this bridge having spent seven months as a team member on its recent restoration, and a bunch of time researching it and its bridgewright.
I don't know JP, and don't want to step on any toes, but when I add information and photographs, I'm going to feel inclined to make some corrections.
What is seen as forum protocol and proper cyber etiquette in doing such?
Our work on the Gilpin's to be honored by the Maryland Historical Trust for "exceptional quality of the workmanship" with their annual Project Excellence Award
http://tiny.cc/hjycg