Photos 

< Previous   (1 of 14)   Next >

Main spans from north

< Previous   (2 of 14)   Next >

Main spans from northeast

< Previous   (3 of 14)   Next >

Main spans from northwest

< Previous   (4 of 14)   Next >

East approach from State Line Road

< Previous   (5 of 14)   Next >

Looking north from Shawnee Avenue

< Previous   (6 of 14)   Next >

Crossing over Shawnee Avenue

< Previous   (7 of 14)   Next >

Looking southeast from Adams Street

< Previous   (8 of 14)   Next >

Crossing over Adams Street

< Previous   (9 of 14)   Next >

Bent at Adams Street

< Previous   (10 of 14)   Next >

Tower bent at Adams Street

< Previous   (11 of 14)   Next >

Looking northwest from Kansas Avenue

< Previous   (12 of 14)   Next >

Crossing over Kansas Avenue

< Previous   (13 of 14)   Next >

Middle truss from 7th Street Trafficway

< Previous   (14 of 14)   Next >

North truss from 7th Street Trafficway

Map 

Vicinity Map

Vicinity map

Map links:

Facts 

Overview
Two-level through truss bridge and network of approaches over Kansas River on the KCTRR in Kansas City
Location
Kansas City, Wyandotte County, Kansas
Status
Open to traffic
History
Built 1917; rehabilitated 2005
Design
Baltimore through truss, with flood jacks
Dimensions
Length of largest span: 300.0 ft.
Total length: 5,210.6 ft.
Approximate latitude, longitude
+39.08465, -94.61113   (decimal degrees)
39°05'05" N, 94°36'40" W   (degrees°minutes'seconds")
Inventory number
BH 18690 (Bridgehunter.com ID)
Inspection
Average daily traffic (as of 2000)
500

Categories 

Baltimore truss (39)
Built 1917 (288)
Built during 1910s (3,558)
Double decker (10)
Kansas (1,443)
Kansas City Terminal Railway (1)
Kansas City, Kansas (22)
Open (21,592)
Owned by railroad (599)
Span length 250-500 feet (571)
Through truss (5,206)
Total length over 2500 feet (337)
Truss (15,740)
Wyandotte County, Kansas (25)

Update Log 

Post a comment here · Contact webmaster

Comments 

Highline Bridge
Posted March 24, 2007, by Bill-KCKs

I believe this bridge originally had a screw-jack lifting mechanism similar to Railroad Bridge 3 & 4. I vividly recall the installation of the hydraulic jacks in the early 60's.

Prior to the start of the 1993 flood, the hydraulics were in disrepair and evidently had not been tested for years. Rumor had it that it was cheaper for the railroad to pay the fine for not testing the mechanism than to disrupt traffic. There was a mad scramble to find parts and hydraulic fluid, and in the end, only 2 sections were lifted. For years, a large tree dangled from the span that didn't lift.

Somewhere, I have slides of the KCT crews closing the stop-log gap in the floodwall during the 1993 flood.

Highline Bridge
Posted December 31, 2006, by Bob Franke (glad6813 [at] netzero [dot] net)

Mr. McClanahan is correct. The three river spans can be raised during high water. The lifting mechanisms were added sometime after the 1951 flood.

During the 1993 flood one or two spans were not able to be lifted. I'm not sure of why they were not able to be lifted.

For many years a portion of the upper deck was restricted to a single track. The entire structure was strengthened a couple of years ago. The concrete deck was replaced, additional steel added, and the second track restored across the entire length. Train speed, which was limited to 10-15 mph, was raised to 40 mph.

On 3/13/93 an oversized load derailed and caused the collaspe of two approach spans on the west side of the bridge. An east bound train on the Highline was able to stop a few hundred feet west of the collaspe.

Highline Bridge
Posted December 16, 2006, by Mr. Kelly McClanahan (KMCCLA [at] aol [dot] com)

This very well could be, although I have no first hand knowledge, I have heard that the bridges over the Kaw (Kansas River)can be raised due to flooding.

Highline Bridge
Posted September 18, 2006, by david mitchell (dfmitche [at] uncg [dot] edu)

Can anyone tell me when the vertical steel structures at the ends of the spans that cross the river were added and what they are for? A photo from the mid-fifties shows no such structure, but on in the mid-sixties do show them. Are they additions made because of the 1950 flood?