No votes cast

Big Walnut Creek Bridge


Photo From Indiana SHAARD Database / Division of Historic Preservation and Archaeology


BH Photo #182929


Concrete arch bridge over Big Walnut Creek on CR 650 East
Putnam County, Indiana
Replaced by a new bridge
Built ca. 1940; Replaced 2016
Concrete closed spandrel deck arch with unique steep grade design.
Length of largest span: 73.5 ft.
Total length: 158.1 ft.
Deck width: 21.0 ft.
Also called
Bridge 248
Approximate latitude, longitude
+39.82456, -86.73380   (decimal degrees)
39°49'28" N, 86°44'02" W   (degrees°minutes'seconds")
Approximate UTM coordinates
16/522781/4408318 (zone/easting/northing)
Quadrangle map:
North Salem
Average daily traffic (as of 2015)
Inventory numbers
INNBI 6700203 (Indiana bridge number on the National Bridge Inventory)
BH 16910 (Bridgehunter.com ID)
Inspection report (as of March 2015)
Overall condition: Poor
Superstructure condition rating: Poor (4 out of 9)
Substructure condition rating: Poor (4 out of 9)
Sufficiency rating: 48.2 (out of 100)
View more at BridgeReports.com

Update Log 

  • March 27, 2018: Updated by David Backlin: Updated to Replaced
  • October 21, 2010: New photos from Nathan Holth


Big Walnut Creek Bridge
Posted October 22, 2010, by Anthony Dillon (spansaver [at] hotmail [dot] com)

With few exceptions, that is pretty much the way Putnam County has been toward it's historic spans. They close, and sometimes quietly remove, their metal through trusses. They avoid federal funding to skirt preservation guidelines in replacing their metal pony trusses. Even their covered spans are not National Register listed which allows for questionable repairs which are not always in-kind.

They still have a really nice collection of wooden, metal and concrete spans. It would be nice to see them adopt a plan to take care of them.

Big Walnut Creek Bridge
Posted October 21, 2010, by Nathan Holth (form3 [at] historicbridges [dot] org)

The skew of this bridge along with a noticeable grade create a complex and bizarre structure that is quite unique. The county highway supervisor said "There's nothing in the design of that bridge that merits it being historical." I don't know what his training or experience with historic bridges consist of, but my seven years of obsessive involvement in historic bridges leads me to strongly disagree with his statement. I have not seen many concrete arch bridges with both a noteworthy grade and a heavy skew.