
Photo courtesy of the Indiana State Department of Natural Resource, Division of Historic Preservation and Archaeology.
View more info about Indiana historic bridges from the SHAARD database
Unfortunately.....I don't think the responsible parties really care......
I agree with Matt. Having a comparison can be beneficial. There is no better argument in favor of preservation than comparing the appearance of a historic truss bridge to a pre-stressed slab of box beams.
Adding the Street Views to show a replacement bridge doesn't bother me. Its not like the Street View is cluttering up the bridge listings like when a modern bridge is added to as its own dedicated BridgeHunter page.
I agree that the UCEB's are structures that nobody wants to look at; however, providing a street view of a replacement structure does provide a glimpse of the damage done when an historic bridge is replaced, and helps to increase public awareness of the negative effects of such a replacement--I've added a few street views to my own historic bridge additions, just to make an impact statement that says, "How do you like it now!? See what you've done??"
I have to agree, having a street view of the UCEB replacement to a lost truss bridge is indeed a "poop quake". There is no use in a street view of the replacement. It is not necessary at all.
Tony's photo's of the original truss bridge from the Indiana State Department : Priceless.
Sheldon's street view of the UCEB : wait...
wait for it...
POOP QUAKE!!!
Sheldon....I'm rather confused why you would add a street view of a UCEB that replaced an historic span almost 25 years ago. I remember this bridge well and added the old photos of it for others to enjoy...... I don't think anyone cares what the ugly slab looks like.
This belongs on the Uglybridges site.