Rating:
1 vote

Rohrabaugh's Bridge

Photo 

Bridge 8

Copyright - Paul Brandenburg

Enlarge

BH Photo #116096

Map 

Facts 

Overview
Pony truss bridge over Sugar Creek on CR 250 South
Location
Carroll County, Indiana
Status
Replaced by a modern bridge in 2004 and placed in storage for later reuse.
History
Built 1908; Replaced 2004
Builders
- Attica Bridge Co. of Attica, Indiana (Fabricator)
- James M. Peirce (Substructure)
Design
3-panel, bolted Warren Pony truss
Dimensions
Length of largest span: 43.6 ft.
Total length: 48.9 ft.
Deck width: 15.7 ft.
Also called
Carroll County Bridge #8
Sugar Creek CR 250 South Bridge
Approximate latitude, longitude
+40.51111, -86.68176   (decimal degrees)
40°30'40" N, 86°40'54" W   (degrees°minutes'seconds")
Approximate UTM coordinates
16/526961/4484536 (zone/easting/northing)
Quadrangle map:
Delphi
Average daily traffic (as of 2011)
144
Inventory numbers
INNBI 0800006 (Indiana bridge number on the National Bridge Inventory)
BH 15880 (Bridgehunter.com ID)
Inspection report (as of May 2017)
Overall condition: Good
Superstructure condition rating: Good (7 out of 9)
Substructure condition rating: Very Good (8 out of 9)
Deck condition rating: Good (7 out of 9)
Sufficiency rating: 100 (out of 100)
View more at BridgeReports.com

Update Log 

  • October 16, 2010: Updated by Anthony Dillon: Bridge does still exist in storage
  • June 30, 2008: Updated by Paul Brandenburg: clarified Warren Pony Truss
  • June 29, 2008: Updated by Paul Brandenburg: bridge replaced
  • June 26, 2008: Updated by Paul Brandenburg: added county bridge number

Sources 

  • Paul Brandenburg - indianabridges [at] sbcglobal [dot] net
  • Tony Dillon - spansaver [at] hotmail [dot] com

Comments 

Bridge 8
Posted March 9, 2013, by AR

Oh. My bad. Sorry.

Bridge 8
Posted March 9, 2013, by AR

Oh. My bad. Sorry.

Bridge 8
Posted March 9, 2013, by Luke Harden (lukemh9 [at] gmail [dot] com)

The inspection numbers are for the replacement.

Bridge 8
Posted March 9, 2013, by AR

The last inspection stats look really good; why was this bridge replaced?