For anyone interested, this bridge will be demolished soon. I'm working on the historic documenation of the bridge that's required under a Memorandum of Agreement signed last September between the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the Iowa State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). Last Friday the Iowa SHPO approved the photographic documenation of the bridge, which gives the green light to the USACE to issue a permit that will allow the demolition company to begin work.
John, thank you for the information. The date in the Rock Island file, in particular, seems to clinch it. I appreciate your help.
I was actually the one who tracked down the date. My reasoning for 1894 was:
1) The BCR&N built bridges in sets by similar designs. There *was* an identical span north of Waterloo, which Iowa Northern reported to be built in 1894.
2) All pictures, descriptions and other relations to the old bridge place the current bridge in the 1890s.
3) I stumbled upon a Rock Island file of some sorts dating the bridge to 1894. I can no longer find that file, but if I do, I will post it.
Thanks for the reply. The information I have states that the present Pratt through truss bridge replaced an earlier railroad bridge in the same location some time between about 1876 and 1905. The BCR&N acquired the previous bridge in 1876 as part of the trackage of a failed earlier railroad. The BCR&N at some point replaced the earlier bridge with the present one, and I'm trying to figure out exactly when that was.
That's the time the Burlington, Cedar Rapids, & Northern would have been building through Columbus Junction,if memory serves, so it's a fairly safe estimate that the bridge was built then.
This bridge is said to have been built in 1894. Could someone tell me the source of this date?
FYI for anybody who might be interested...
Part of my background was in heavy equipment demolition, specifically rail equipment. That company folded a few years ago, but last winter the former owner was working with some investors and attempting to get another scrap company going. Besides rail equipment, he was also looking at getting into bridge demolition, so I brought this bridge to his attention as a possible candidate.
He called Tyson several times inquiring about the bridge but could never get them to give him a straight answer as to what their intentions for it were. That being said, anybody who is interested in seeing this bridge re-used for trail usage in the future should take heart from this. Whatever Tyson has planned for this bridge's future, they don't seem to be in a big hurry to sell it off and have it torn down.
Now I know that some of you might be shocked or offended that somebody who contributes to this website might seek to be part of a historic bridge's destruction, but before you have a stroke at your keyboard, please consider: While I don't get into the nuts and bolts, so to speak, of bridge type or history like many of you do, I do enjoy looking at them or photographing them from time to time. However, I'm also a realist. Not every bridge ever built can be saved, and many of them are going to have to come down at some time.
While I would have regretted seeing it come down, I personally would have jumped at the chance to take part in its demolition if the opportunity would have arrived. It is simply the nature of the beast. I am a passionate railfan, but that didn't stop me from destroying numerous old locomotives when the job called for it. The Rock Island will always be my favorite railroad, and this bridge is one of the major pieces of its legacy still standing in SE Iowa. Personally, I am glad that it seems to be safe for now and hopefully it will become part of the Hoover Trail. Time will tell.
Warning to all who go back here....
Its a nice bridge, although the smell from the Tyson plant is strong enough to make someone puke
Hopefully it can become part of the Hoover Trail in the future.
According to what I've ascertained, Tyson Foods actually owns the bridge.