This bridge's replacement is in the news, prompting yet-another scaremongering article about how "bad" Iowa's bridges are.
https://www.thegazette.com/iowa-ideas/when-it-comes-to-iowa-...
(Even though most of the "bad" bridges are on gravel roads rarely traveled by anyone but locals.)
As much as I would LOVE to see a bridge built in 2003 classified as junk a mere 20 years later, I think they are actually referring to a 1920s stringer bridge #204130 south of this location on the same road. Leading me to this conclusion is the ungalvanized steel angle railing visible in the news article photo. Also these statistics annoy me because they are being manipulated to make them say what people want them to say. What is a "bad" bridge? Because it is posted for load? Half the bridges in the United Kingdom are narrow, one-lane "Weak Bridges" but that doesn't mean they are considered "Bad Bridges." However under this article (and other similar publications) they would be. Just because something is restricted does not mean it is insufficient for its use, or that it is not worth preserving.