Forum

Page 1 of 531 Next >

Post a comment Contact webmaster

Posted January 26, 2021, by Jason Smith (flensburg [dot] bridgehunter [dot] av [at] googlemail [dot] com)
Posted January 25, 2021, by James McCray (jamesinslocomb [at] yahoo [dot] com)

This bridge will be relocated and reconstructed.

https://amp.indystar.com/amp/1431710001

Posted January 25, 2021, by Mike Daffron (daffmikron [at] gmail [dot] com)

Found more interesting tidbits connected to this bridge. An article was published on the tornado that tore apart the bridge (and the surrounding communities) in the New York Times (!) on May 30, 1883. Here is an excerpt:

"At a point where a bridge crossed Eel River eight or ten persons, some of them being in a wagon, south shelter on the bridge. The bridge was shattered and men, women, wagon and mules went into the river together. Joseph Seeley and Mrs. Hay were killed outright and five persons were injured. The Mules escaped without a scratch."

This newspaper article was reproduced in a excellent little book titled "History of Patricksburg" by Joyce Van Dyke Skinner and Margie E. Byerly.

Posted January 25, 2021, by Troy Knox (troyjknox [at] hotmail [dot] com)

I will try to swing over there again soon and see if I can find the inscription and post some additional photos. I need to hit that area anyway to get additional pictures for my facebook page Bridging the Driftless. This site has been an incredible resource for me in my research for that page so anything I can do to help is a small thank you for all the work that has been put into it.

Utica Bridge (Illinois)
Posted January 25, 2021, by Ron Johnson (mfpd24 [at] yahoo [dot] com)

According to the local newspaper this bridge will be coming down sometime next week, the city is supposed to have an area set up for spectators.

Posted January 25, 2021, by ECRT (pcramer [at] ecattrail [dot] org)

This line isn't abandoned but is in fact railbanked for use as a future multi-use trail. Buffalo Pittsburgh Railroad still owns the line and retains the right to reactivate it for rail service. The rails were pulled in 2010. There currently is a feasibility study underway to evaluate the bridge for rehabilitation for pedestrian use for foot/bike traffic. It would be a major attraction in the area for rail fans and outdoor enthusiasts to enjoy the amazing vistas of the surrounding area and Cattaraugus Creek. For more information, visit: www.ecattrail.org

Posted January 25, 2021, by Lee (Chesser)

I was told this bridge was erected in another place, is this true? if so where, I grew up in a white house on the Washington Co. side of the river' If it was I would like to see it again

Lee Chesser

Posted January 25, 2021, by Mike Goff (michael [dot] goff [at] hotmail [dot] com)

Oh lord, palm to face...

Using a timber truss to span 18-feet seems pretty ridiculous and for the low low price of $400K.

Not sure what to think about this thing, it looks as if you folks have the comments covered.

Posted January 25, 2021, by my name (my email)

wow cool bridge dude

Posted January 25, 2021, by William Heath Broadway (whbroadw [at] hotmail [dot] com)

This bridge by the look of the photos looks well enough to be restored as a pedestrian bridge. The climate out in this area is much more drier than the eastern portions of Texas so there should be less rust damage.

Posted January 25, 2021, by Nathan Holth (webmaster [at] historicbridges [dot] org)

Then I come along on some historic truss bridge Section 106 Review and am told a genuine historic bridge cannot be preserved because its "too expensive." This is ridiculous.

Posted January 24, 2021, by Luke

I hate to be That Guy, but it's Cape Girardeau, not Gerrado

Posted January 24, 2021, by David Backlin (us71 [at] cox [dot] net)

I never knew him personally, though we occasionally exchanged info on bridges

Posted January 24, 2021, by Tom Hoffman

I regret to inform anyone reading this. I came across an article saying that the state or whoever has changed their minds and is now going to DEMOLISH and replace this bridge once westbound is completed! This a crummy and disgusting course of action. Its current condition is fair and it could easily be rehabbed for three lanes eastbound! I sure will miss crossing this bridge when I drive to North Carolina. West Virginia hasn't been good with historic significant bridges. Two steel plate girders will cause stress.

Posted January 24, 2021, by Tony Dillon (spansaver [at] hotmail [dot] com)

It's beyond unbelievable that this bridge was allowed to remain open without considerable improvements.

Posted January 24, 2021, by Tony Dillon (spansaver [at] hotmail [dot] com)

All I know is that they spent about 380K too much on it.

Posted January 24, 2021, by Melissa Brand-Welch (melissabrandwelch [at] msn [dot] com)

Tony and Mike, you're both wrong. It's obviously a snow cone stand.

Posted January 24, 2021, by Tony Dillon (spansaver [at] hotmail [dot] com)

...Or pull your lawnmower out of it to cut the grass!

Posted January 24, 2021, by Melissa Brand-Welch (melissabrandwelch [at] msn [dot] com)

I have researched and read about so many bridge disasters I'm developing anxiety when I go across bridges.

Posted January 24, 2021, by Mike Daffron (daffmikron [at] gmail [dot] com)

Looks like you could pick up your photos while your are there...or maybe a chocolate shake.

Posted January 24, 2021, by Mike Daffron (daffmikron [at] gmail [dot] com)

Sounds like a great flick on "Shudder"!

Posted January 24, 2021, by Luke

When your HOA has more money than sense.

Posted January 24, 2021, by Tony Dillon (spansaver [at] hotmail [dot] com)

Seriously? They spent 400K on this???

They could've built a slab with a lid on it for a fraction of that... and it wouldn't have looked any worse. Wow!

EBT - Pogue Bridge (Pennsylvania)
Posted January 24, 2021, by doug langdon (doug_langdon [at] bellsouth [dot] net)

The railroad's new owners "East Broad Top Foundation" have cleared undergrowth and had the bridge inspected, plan to run trains across this bridge within two years.

their facebook page is https://www.facebook.com/ebtrr

doug langdon

Posted January 24, 2021, by Art S. (Asuckewer [at] knite [dot] com)

Tony,

I think it will take an ongoing effort to turn things around. The county still isn't convinced but I think there is a chance.

Clark,

I believe the railing is original. It did have accident damage which was 'improved' while it was off.

Most bridges I've encountered look really bad but are usually stronger than they appear. This one was the opposite. It is a minor miracle it hadn't collapsed under a grain truck.

As I am aware of what was done; rather than say, I'll make it a bridgehunter challenge: For those able to visit the bridge, see if you can figure out what was done and what is still needed (besides paint :^) ).

Regards,

Art S.

Posted January 24, 2021, by Luke

Did someone say Agua Fria? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zzICMIu5zFY

Posted January 24, 2021, by Tony Dillon (spansaver [at] hotmail [dot] com)

I would assume they were reattached to the hangers on the verticals. Of course it offers no real protection to the truss members, but without a full rehabilitation and installation of a protective system that is the best that can be done.

Posted January 24, 2021, by Clark Vance (cvance [at] dogmail [dot] com)

Is the new inside "railing" welded to the bridge members? Was that their reinforcement?

Posted January 24, 2021, by William Heath Broadway (whbroadw [at] hotmail [dot] com)

There are photos of this bridge from the Brazoria County Historical Museum online. One of the photos described the bridge had collapsed due to erosion.

Posted January 24, 2021, by Tony Dillon (spansaver [at] hotmail [dot] com)

Art,

I couldn't agree more with you!

Dicks is on a secondary road with a low ADT Count, and I doubt if the county will be in any rush to reopen it. Barnard on the other hand carries a decent amount of traffic (I think the 170 count on it is wrong btw).

We proved to Putnam County way back in 2006 with the Hibbs Ford Bridge that restoring these bridges is more economical. But yet they still haven't grasped the concept. They have demolished with no replacement (Appleby Ford); abandoned (Pinhook); bypassed and abandoned (Sutherlin Ford); demolished and replaced (Crow's); and given away (Houck). They did do some work on the Cooper Bridge, but I've not seen it to know what it amounts to.

I greatly appreciate your help with the Barnard Bridge and can only hope that the light bulb goes on and the county steps up and does what they need to... with it and the few other metal trusses that remain!

Posted January 23, 2021, by Art S. (Asuckewer [at] knite [dot] com)

Tony,

I'm not sure about their priorities but unless Dick's is at risk removal, I'd rather see them actually fix this one first. The county promotes their covered bridges, it would be nice to add some trusses to the mix. If they proactively restored it, besides creating an attraction, their overall maintenance costs will go down.

I think doing so may demonstrate the benefit and help all of the bridges in the county.

Regards,

Art S.

Posted January 23, 2021, by Art S. (Asuckewer [at] knite [dot] com)

Still heading in the right direction:

https://mercerme.com/public-meeting-scheduled-to-determine-f...

Public meeting scheduled to determine fate of Mine Road Bridge

Public meeting scheduled to determine fate of Mine Road Bridge

By Mary Galioto -January 23, 2021

The future of the historic Mine Road Bridge in Hopewell Township is in jeopardy. The truss bridge, straddling the Stony Brook on Mine Road off of Route 31 in Hopewell Township, suffered some damage in recent years after a storm and has since been closed to all traffic. Mercer County proposes to replace the bridge with a brand new, much wider structure. The bridge, as built, has a 4-ton load rating. The County proposes a brand new bridge with a 40-ton load capacity. Hopewell Township will hold a public meeting on Wednesday, January 27 at 5pm, to discuss the Bridge’s future.

Erected in 1885, the Mine Road Truss Bridge is one of only two iron truss bridges that remain in Hopewell Township and is the only one in its original site. Originally manufactured by the King Iron Bridge Company, the bridge served a mine, for which the bridge and road are named, which was established after one of Hopewell’s original settlers, Roger Parke, discovered a nugget of silver. While no more silver was ever found during the Colonial period, the mine resumed in the nineteenth century extracting baryta, also known as white lead, according to Hopewell: A Historical Geography by Richard Hunter and Richard Porter.

The Hopewell Township Historic Preservation Commission (HTHPC) passed a Resolution in fall 2020 requesting that the County reconsider its plans to replace the historic Mine Road Truss Bridge, based on its deep local history and designation as a Township historic landmark. The Resolution was forwarded to the Hopewell Township Committee, which scheduled the public meeting to hear from residents.

One of the HTHPC commissioners, Anita Crane said: “It is an important symbol of bygone days when Mine Road linked farms, mines, and quarries along Stony Brook. Aesthetically, it sits in a small valley surrounded by farmland and wooded area. Standing on it, you can see through the iron webbed floor to the bubbling brook below that beckons trout fishing. To move this bridge to another location would compromise the beauty of the location and its historical significance for Hopewell Township and Mercer County.”

The HTHPC proposes that the County work in conjunction with the Township to rehabilitate the Mine Road Bridge, “using it to its greatest potential while preserving it as the last iron truss bridge remaining in situ in Hopewell Township.” Specifically, the HTHPC urges the County to either (a) conduct minor repairs of the Mine Road Bridge in order to bring it to safety standards for a 4-ton load rating; or (b) close the Mine Road Bridge permanently, leaving it as a pedestrian/ bicycle trail only.

The Township Committee will hold a public meeting to discuss the alternatives and listen to the community’s preferences for the future of this bridge on Wednesday, January 27 at 5pm. The agenda and Zoom link are posted in the Agenda Center on the Township website. At this meeting, the County will present the various options it is considering. The Township Committee encourages interested community members to voice their opinions at the meeting.

Public comment will be accepted at the meeting or by contacting Laurie Gompf, the Township Clerk, at lgompf@hopewelltwp.org.

Related documents can be found here (Mercer County recommendations) and here (Hopewell Township Historic Preservation Commission Resolution.

Posted January 22, 2021, by Nathan Holth (webmaster [at] historicbridges [dot] org)

Thanks Geoff, its fixed now!

Posted January 22, 2021, by Mike Daffron (daffmikron [at] gmail [dot] com)

Alright, Art! You are a barer of good news! Hope they can get Dicks Road bridge fixed now

Posted January 22, 2021, by Art S. (Asuckewer [at] knite [dot] com)

A tidbit of good news.

Not any prettier but open:

https://www.bannergraphic.com/story/2861272.html

Regards,

Art S.

Posted January 22, 2021, by Geoff Hubbs (geoffrey [dot] hubbs [at] att [dot] net)

The later post is the correct location, I'll try to delete the first one.

Posted January 22, 2021, by Nathan Holth (webmaster [at] historicbridges [dot] org)

Wow, it appears this extremely rare lenticular pony truss has slipped under the radar all these years!

Posted January 21, 2021, by Roger Deschner (rogerdeschner [at] gmail [dot] com)

Toll free through January 31. Discounted $1 toll for all of February with EZPass/I-pass. Time for a little joyride on a very high bridge with a great view of steel mills and Lake Michigan.

Posted January 21, 2021, by Patrick Gurwell (pgurwell [at] gmail [dot] com)

Nice work Luke. Thank you.

Sands Bridge (Massachusetts)
Posted January 21, 2021, by Luke

I'm sure NIMBYism had a lot to do with killing it.

Sands Bridge (Massachusetts)
Posted January 21, 2021, by Nick Boppel (nickboppel01 [at] gmail [dot] com)

I was able to confirm that the reports of collapse were (fortunately) just rumors and that the bridge is indeed still standing (I wasn't able to get any pictures, hopefully in the near future). That being said, the northern/western arch is in severe danger of collapse, while the southern/eastern arch is mostly intact. I would hope that even if one arch fails the other one would remain standing, though this bridge really needs to be restored. There was talk about running a pedestrian/bicycle trail through here at one time, as this alignment is historic as one of the oldest horse and carriage routes in New England. I'm not sure if anything ever became of that.

Twin Bridges (Kentucky)
Posted January 21, 2021, by Clark Vance (cvance [at] dogmail [dot] com)

It sure sounds like they plan on keeping the northbound which is the older of the two. Interesting decision if not an error in reporting. Maybe the newer one becomes a party venue!

Twin Bridges (Kentucky)
Posted January 21, 2021, by Nathan Holth (webmaster [at] historicbridges [dot] org)

This article makes it sound like the rare surviving 1930s Modjeski and Masters cantilever truss might be spared demolition.

https://landline.media/i-69-ohio-river-crossing-will-include...

Posted January 21, 2021, by Satolli Glassmeyer (info [at] HistoryInYourOwnBackyard [dot] com)

Here's a video I rcently did about the bridge: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xuW4jzz6w8U

Posted January 21, 2021, by Randy Nelson (ranreco [at] gmail [dot] com)

Is this bridge for sale still or has it been rehabbed?

Posted January 21, 2021, by Jason Smith (flensburg [dot] bridgehunter [dot] av [at] googlemail [dot] com)

Before we announce the winners of the Bridgehunter Awards for 2020 as well as the Author's Choice Awards, I would like to have your attention to some changes that will take place for the 2021 Bridgehunter Awards. Specifically, we will have four new categories, two of which will honor the late James Baughn, who died on December 6th. Deadlines for submissions and the announcement of the winners of the 2021 Awards have also been announced. Details here:

https://bridgehunterschronicles.wordpress.com/2021/01/21/202...

RE: Bridgeport Overpass railroad bridge
Posted January 20, 2021, by Luke

Originally Buffalo, Rochester, & Pittsburgh, later Baltimore & Ohio

Bridgeport Overpass railroad bridge
Posted January 20, 2021, by Patrick Gurwell (pgurwell [at] gmail [dot] com)

Luke,

Just posted a new listing for the RR-Bridgeport Rd Overpass. I see that in Google Maps, that line is not even shown. Can you research, cause you seem to be good at it, and adjust the Railroad name? That would be helpful. Thanks.

Patrick

Bridge Lookup
Posted January 20, 2021, by Geoff Hubbs (geoffrey [dot] hubbs [at] att [dot] net)

If it's any help, the Missouri Pacific/Flint Hills Nature Trail Bridge was onthe Council Grove Branch at Milepost 345.3. It doesn't appear to be one of the ones posted on BridgeHunter.

looking for riveted steel
Posted January 20, 2021, by Eric Warner (ideafactorydesign [at] gmail [dot] com)

Hi I am an Architect in North Carolina, I am looking for a bulky riveted steel column/girder at least 9'long, preferrably 14-18" square. can anyone help me with a source? thank in advance for your help.

RE: Bridge Lookup
Posted January 20, 2021, by Luke

It would show up in a track chart under that number, and I don't know if MoPac is one of the lines that lists their build dates in their track charts.

Bridge Lookup
Posted January 20, 2021, by Dan McGurk (prenger745 [at] yahoo [dot] com)

Hello,

Is there anyway to lookup the history of a bridge if I have its bridge number?

It is an old railroad bridge and it is either:3453 or 3A53. I believe it is most likely 3453.

It is located on the Flint Hills Nature Trail near Rantoul, KS. The placard that had the date has either fallen off or been taken.

Just a cool old bridge.

Posted January 19, 2021, by Anonymous

Doug, YouTube videos are copyrighted content.

RE: picture
Posted January 19, 2021, by Luke

Tom, I don't know if Royce still lurks the forums, so it'd probably be best to message him at roycehaley111 @ yahoo dot com

Picture of bridge...
Posted January 19, 2021, by Tom Fogarty (tomfogarty34 [at] gmail [dot] com)

I would like to know if I can use this picture without incurring any copy right issues?

Looking West

Photo taken by Royce and Bobette Haley in July 2016

Enlarge

BH Photo #359332

Thank you,

Tom Fogarty

716-998-4400

Posted January 19, 2021, by my name (email address)

very unique bridge you have there

Posted January 19, 2021, by Ed Hollowell (erhollowell [at] aol [dot] com)

This is a very unique and interesting bridge.

Posted January 19, 2021, by my name (email address)

very pretty i like it

Posted January 19, 2021, by my name (email address)

i love to walk on these types of bridges!

10/10

Posted January 19, 2021, by my name (email address)

very nice!

Posted January 19, 2021, by my name (email address )

this looks super cool!

good work on the photos!

they turned out good.

Posted January 19, 2021, by my name (email address)

i love old things and this is really good,

i might even hang it up on my wall.

goodbye!

The Tridge (Michigan)
Posted January 19, 2021, by my name (email address)

this cool bridge i like bridge

Posted January 19, 2021, by Anonymous

Bridge is now open to traffic

Posted January 19, 2021, by Chester Gehman (gehmanc2000 [at] yahoo [dot] com)

1. The information in the description of this bridge, as found in the New Jersey Historic Bridge Data for Hunterdon County,is attributed to Victor C. Darnell (Darnell, p. 85). This is incorrect. Darnell is cited as a bibliographical source, and pertains only to information concerning the Smith Bridge Company (Directory Of American Bridge-Building Companies 1840-1900)

2. Smith Bridge Company WAS a "smaller company", as was Massillon Bridge, when compared to larger companies of the time such as Kellogg and King, for example. While Darnell has no information for Smith, shop capacities in the year 1894 were: Massillon, 6.0 tons; Kellogg, 26 tons; King, 18 tons. By 1903, Kellogg was out of business, bu King's capacity had increased to 30 tons, while Massillon was at 8 tons. (information from Darnell)

3. Smith sold the company in 1890 to Toledo Bridge Company, who in turn sold it to the American Bridge Company in 1901.

If the information about the Point Mountain Road Bridge from Hunterdon County data is correct, then a build date of 1905 is possible. Quoting from the NJ Data page, "Smith, however, went back into business as Smith Bridge Company. How much past 1905 the small operation continued is not known." Darnell is silent on this point. There are several bridges on BH built after 1890 attributed to Smith. Are they correct? Who knows?

Posted January 19, 2021, by Jimmy Walters

I was half asleep, last night and posted links to pictures of this bridge on the wrong bridge page. Glad I checked it out, this morning, lol.

Posted January 18, 2021, by Clark Vance (cvance [at] dogmail [dot] com)

Several postcards from the era including the ones on this site:

https://www.cardcow.com/296603/topeka-kansas-vinewood-park/

Posted January 18, 2021, by Nick Schmiedeler (nick [at] nickschmiedeler [dot] com)

Original iron bridge lattice railings removed and now are used as "KEEP OUT" fences

WNY&P - Wye Bridge (Pennsylvania)
Posted January 18, 2021, by William Main (willm [at] nym [dot] hush [dot] com)

Possible video here: https://youtu.be/T2-ErA8o_00

Posted January 18, 2021, by Garrett Boon (onefiddle [at] gmail [dot] com)

I am deeply saddened to hear this. I never knew James personally, but only through his work on this website.

Posted January 18, 2021, by Franz Dobler Jr. (fjdoblerjr [at] yahoo [dot] com)

Pretty sure the netting has only been under the bridge for the past 5-7 years.

Posted January 18, 2021, by Satolli Glassmeyer (info [at] HistoryInYourOwnBackyard [dot] com)

Here's a video I recently did about the bridge: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tv_SqVeIn8E

Posted January 18, 2021, by Luke

Such a project is underway, but there's a lot of NIMBYism from farmers trying to stop it, complete with the same bad-faith arguments you hear from NIMBYs in the city.

Posted January 18, 2021, by david yates (dyates197 [at] gmail [dot] com)

By looking at the satellite photos after the fire, there appears minimal damage to the bridge. With it three tunnels and two impressive bridges, converting the abandoned Rock Island line into a rail to trail would certainly rival the popularity of the Katy Trail.

Posted January 16, 2021, by Mike Daffron (daffmikron [at] gmail [dot] com)

This bridge is going straight to hell. Needs repair, paint, whatnot.

Posted January 16, 2021, by James Smith (docbug [at] mindspring [dot] com)

Two bridges are confused here. The Big Four bridge was on the Peoria & Eastern RR, now gone. The Monon bridge was on the Monon RR and still carries CSX trains over Sugar Creek. It is not open to pedestrian traffic.

Posted January 16, 2021, by Tony Dillon (spansaver [at] hotmail [dot] com)

Bridge only stood at this location for about 16 years before it was replaced (That bridge was also replaced in 2007). A gentleman in Canada bought it and moved it there as a toll bridge for logging use.

https://archive.macleans.ca/article/1968/8/1/canadas-biggest...

Posted January 16, 2021, by Douglas Butler

What about this one ?

Posted January 16, 2021, by Luke

It is now.

Posted January 16, 2021, by Douglas Butler

Is this location right ?

Posted January 16, 2021, by Mary Stockton (Mary12bc [at] gmail [dot] com)

Fond memories of when my Uncle Bill(Carl)Helvey and Aunt Boots owned that pavilion across this bridge. They had the bar and it had pool tables and a dance hall where many bands played and the folks that were camping also the locals would come to listen and dance. I remember horses being tied up to the posts that held the pavilion up so when the river flooded the water wouldn’t get in it. Thinking my uncle sold that early 80’s.

Posted January 15, 2021, by Garrett DiDomizio (garrettdidomizio [at] gmail [dot] com)

I wonder who the builder was

Posted January 15, 2021, by Garrett DiDomizio (garrettdidomizio [at] gmail [dot] com)

I surely hope they do something with this! It would definitely look cool as the centerpiece in a park or a secondary access road in a town.

Posted January 15, 2021, by Garrett DiDomizio (garrettdidomizio [at] gmail [dot] com)

Quite a cool looking bridge! Similar in build to the Mayer road bridge in Warrick County.

Posted January 15, 2021, by Garrett DiDomizio (garrettdidomizio [at] gmail [dot] com)

A bit less authentic than its counterpart in the county with partial steel framing underneath, but still a cool bridge nonetheless!

Posted January 15, 2021, by Garrett DiDomizio (garrettdidomizio [at] gmail [dot] com)

Gotta love it. Honestly this is one of my favorite bridges, just because of authenticity and location. It’s a very peaceful bridge.

Posted January 15, 2021, by Garrett DiDomizio (garrettdidomizio [at] gmail [dot] com)

It’s a neat little bridge, glad to see it there.

Posted January 15, 2021, by Garrett DiDomizio (garrettdidomizio [at] gmail [dot] com)

Love the bridge, always a joy to see! A bit serene at night.

NY 64 Bridge (New York)
Posted January 15, 2021, by Scott Reed (sreed [at] avacoda [dot] com)

This is a very interesting overpass because it has sod on the verge outside the guard rails. It appears to be constructed with a gravel roadbed over the concrete frame with grass planted in the unpaved areas. I would very much like to know who developed this unique design and whether it's in use elsewhewre.

Posted January 15, 2021, by Satolli Glassmeyer (info [at] HistoryInYourOwnBackyard [dot] com)

Here's a link to a video I recently did on the Red Arrow Highway Bridge: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nDURkXpbYf4

Posted January 15, 2021, by John Marvig (marvigj27 [at] gmail [dot] com)

Reportedly, Canadian National is looking at selling 850 miles of low density track in Wisconsin, Michigan and Ontario. The line between Wausau and Tomahawk is to be sold. This line is not particularly heavily used, so the future is cloudy for this route.

Posted January 15, 2021, by John Marvig (marvigj27 [at] gmail [dot] com)

Reportedly, Canadian National is looking at selling 850 miles of low density track in Wisconsin, Michigan and Ontario. The line between Marengo Jct (WI) and White Pine, MI seems to be on the sale block as well. This includes not only this bridge, but the two massive viaducts in Wisconsin and some smaller viaducts as well. This line has been out of service for some time, so the future looks mighty bleak for this particular line..

http://bridgehunter.com/wi/ashland/bh41916/

Posted January 15, 2021, by John Marvig (marvigj27 [at] gmail [dot] com)

Reportedly, Canadian National is looking at selling 850 miles of low density track in Wisconsin, Michigan and Ontario. Reportedly, the line between Green Bay and Denmark is up for sale. There is at least two customers along this line to the south/east of this bridge in Bellevue and Denmark, both of which seem to some level of rail service still in use.

Posted January 15, 2021, by John Marvig (marvigj27 [at] gmail [dot] com)

Reportedly, Canadian National is looking at selling 850 miles of low density track in Wisconsin, Michigan and Ontario. This line between Appleton and Combined Locks, including several bridges in this area, are reportedly on the sale block. Currently, this line only serves a couple of customers. I do not know what will happen to this line if no buyer can be found, but it seems likely that this swing bridge would be in some danger.

Posted January 15, 2021, by John Marvig (marvigj27 [at] gmail [dot] com)

Reportedly, Canadian National is looking at selling 850 miles of low density track in Wisconsin, Michigan and Ontario. The line between Appleton and Manawa, including this bridge, is on the sale block. The crossings have already been paved over near Manawa as of 2016. I am not sure what will happen to the route if it is not sold to a new operator, although seeing as trails are established in Manawa and New London, that could be a possible future.

Posted January 15, 2021, by Satolli Glassmeyer (info [at] HistoryInYourOwnBackyard [dot] com)

Here's a video I recently did on the Red Arrow Highway Bridge: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tv_SqVeIn8E

Posted January 15, 2021, by Jason Smith (flensburg [dot] bridgehunter [dot] av [at] googlemail [dot] com)

Attention everyone! You have one more week to submit your votes for the 2020 Bridgehunter Awards. If you haven't voted, click on the links below:

Best Bridge Photo: https://bridgehunterschronicles.wordpress.com/2020/12/06/202...

Bridge Tour Guide:

https://bridgehunterschronicles.wordpress.com/2020/12/06/202...

Mystery Bridge & Lifetime Achievement:

https://bridgehunterschronicles.wordpress.com/2020/12/07/202...

Best Kept Secret, Best Example of Restored Historic Bridge and Bridge of the Year:

https://bridgehunterschronicles.wordpress.com/2020/12/09/202...

The voting ends on January 22nd at 11:59pm your local time. The winners will be announced the next day on the 23rd.

In addition, the Author's Choice Awards, where the author of BHC pics his best and worst bridge stories for 2020, will be announced next week on the 22nd.

If you haven't voted yet, vote now! Your bridge and your vote matters! :-)

Emerald Gulch bridge,Tombstone Az
Posted January 14, 2021, by Bill Cashman (wlcashman5 [at] yahoo [dot] com)

Hello, I have been looking for any info on this bridge. There is a small sign saying Built by prison labor, 1913.

I can't find any info online about it.

Thanks,

Bill

Posted January 14, 2021, by Tony Dillon (spansaver [at] hotmail [dot] com)

Thanks for "re-posting" this pic Mike!

My info on the other photo was incorrect as I found it to be the Old Red CB that was West of Huntington over the Wabash.

Posted January 14, 2021, by Me (none [at] none [dot] com)

This bridge replaced an old railroad bridge that had been converted to handle vehicular traffic. The old bridge was removed when Hwy 155 was constructed in the late 70s/early 80s. The old bridge was mere feet to the west of the current bridge.


Page 1 of 531 Next >