Recent Arkansas Comments

Post a comment Contact webmaster

Posted November 20, 2019, by Tony Dillon (spansaver [at] hotmail [dot] com)

Yeah... That's pretty messed up to say the least!

This decision doesn't bode well for the Newport Bridge.

Posted November 20, 2019, by Nathan Holth (webmaster [at] historicbridges [dot] org)

https://katv.com/news/local/white-river-bridge-is-demoished-...

This piece from the above article makes no sense, why would you want to blow the bridge up if you loved it:

"It's there one second and gone the next," explained life long Clarendon resident Alison Steeland.

She won a raffle to be the person to detonate the explosives taking down the bridge. "They counted down, and I did it," she said.

But this wasn't an easy decision for Steeland. “They said it should be somebody from here who loved the bridge, “she said.

She was one of many people from Clarendon who fought to keep the White River Bridge standing.

Posted November 20, 2019, by Robert Elder (robertelder1 [at] gmail [dot] com)

I don't need to watch the video with the political twist. I get enough politics in my everyday life without encountering them on bridgehunter.

Posted November 19, 2019, by Jason Smith (flensburg [dot] bridgehunter [dot] av [at] googlemail [dot] com)
Posted November 19, 2019, by Nathan Holth (webmaster [at] historicbridges [dot] org)
Posted November 13, 2019, by Gil Graham, P.E. (ggraham [at] baileybridge [dot] com)

Great job! Congratulations to Bach Steel and all of those involved. The way that bridge appeared to be leaning before the restoration was scary. They rescued it just in time.

Posted November 11, 2019, by Julie Bowers (jbowerz1 [at] gmail [dot] com)

Thanks Art. Everything takes so much time, but eventually things happen.

Posted November 9, 2019, by Michele Waugh (wmichele79 [at] yahoo [dot] com)

Has this been rebuilt since the 2017 flood? It’s a very beautiful place and the bridge looked like it would be fun crossing

Posted November 8, 2019, by Art S. (asuckewer [at] knite [dot] com)

Neat series. Congratulations!

Posted November 8, 2019, by Julie Bowers (jbowerz1 [at] gmail [dot] com)

For Immediate Release Grinnell, Iowa - Holt, Michigan

The long-awaited documentary by Ultimate Restorations on historic truss bridge restoration is now available for viewing at www.ultimaterestorations.com or Amazon Prime. Featuring the 1874 Springfield Des-Arc Bridge, an historic King Iron Bridge Co. bowstring truss in Conway, Faulkner County, Arkansas, the two episodes document how an engineer, craftsmen, two nonprofits, a city, county and state worked together to save a rare historic bridge in the USA. Local screening are also being scheduled.

Bach Steel of Holt and St. Johns, Michigan provided the iron restoration expertise. The craftsmen, Nels Raynor, Derek Pung, Brock Raynor and Lee Pung put their backs into this project from riveting to pack rust removal, repairing splice plates, lifting and resetting old iron. Jim Schiffer, PE of Schiffer Group Engineering, Traverse City, Michigan. (SGI) worked with Bach Steel to detail the repairs. SGI also engineered the caissons by request from Julie Bowers at Workin' Bridges who just didn't want to see another concrete abutment for the historic truss. "These are the kinds of projects we relish. The reuse and preservation of durable cast and wrought iron and steel, that are still serviceable with a little coaxing, to recreate elegant functional forms that the communities can enjoy is really fun. These are the projects that we enjoy applying our technical experience and training to bring to successful completion." stated Jim Schiffer after viewing the video. Though you don't see him in the site work, without his engineering neither Workin' Bridges nor Bach Steel would be able to act on these jobs.

Working with the City of Conway and Faulkner County, the planning and iron work for the restoration of this bowstring took well over a year after lifting it from the North Fork of the Cadron River. The bridge was restored and reset at Lake Beaverfork in August of 2016. The project began, however, with a site visit in 2010 to discuss the potential of the oldest road bridge in Arkansas, also a King Iron bridge. The project required the aid of the Prof. Kenneth Barnes, then a director of the Faulkner County Historic Society to continue raising the awareness that this vintage bridge needed help. Many of these stories can be seen on the video.

Bach Steel has worked on over 40 historic bridge projects across the country, winning awards for their work in Texas, Michigan and Arkansas since the 1990s. "The Springfield Bridge tells a story of one of the projects that we started with Workin' Bridges in 2010 and it took years to fund it. There are so many bridges across the country that can be restored but it takes political will, our engineer, money and us to get it done....and big cranes!" stated Nels Raynor at the shop in St. Johns.

Ultimate Restorations produced the shows out of the bay area. Producer Terry Strauss along with Executive Producers Bill Hersey, Loren Lovgren, and Bob McNeil have documented the restoration of some of America's beloved treasures. “The story of this bridge is what Ultimate Restorations is all about. The vision to save the iconic pieces of our history that would otherwise be lost, plus the skills, passion and talent to bring them back to life. Walking over that bridge, is like being told a story, reminding us of who we are and where we’ve been.” said Terry Strauss, who directed the film in Arkansas. More info at www.ultimaterestorations.com. You can view the Ultimate Restorations episodes on our bridge restoration as well as the full Season 2 of Ultimate Restorations on Amazon Prime with 1874 Des-Arc Springfield Bridge Part 1: Moving Day and Part 2: Another Hundred Years at https://www.amazon.com/gp/video/detail/B07ZZZJ8D5/ref=atv_dp

One of the red-carpet premieres of Springfield Bridge documentary will be at 2 pm on Sunday, November 24, 2019 in Burlington, Iowa at the restored Capital Theater. Community screening dates are also being pursued in Conway, Arkansas, Lansing / Traverse City, Michigan and Grinnell, Iowa and will be announced soon.

Questions and screening requests can be addressed to Julie Bowers at 641.260.1262 - jbowerz1@gmail.com. You can access more information on the web at www.workinbridges.org and on Facebook at Workin' Bridges, www.bachsteel.com and on Facebook at Bach Steel and www.schiffergroup.com. Restoration photos can be seen at Springfield Bridge on Facebook where the process was also documented.

Posted October 31, 2019, by DC (Coodyd [at] yahoo [dot] com)

While I see why they closed it, there should still be access to it as a walking trail, part of a sight seeing tour. There are two owners one on each side who believe they own each a piece of the bridge, and both of which are not very kind to deal with. Personally heard of arguments, and fights between both landowners between folks kayaking on the creek. I think the bridge should be a project for the kids of the high school to help paint, restore it. It would cost very little to fix the decking on the bridge, the biggest fix would be the two gigantic holes dug on each end of the bridge. The water level is not the same as it was as it was when I was growing up due to it being filled in somewhat during the early 90’s. I personally have no problem help fix it up for future generations. I’ve always loved it, and spent many years on that bridge.

Posted October 25, 2019, by JOSH BEAM (josh [dot] beam [at] bentoncountyar [dot] gov)

This bridge is currently being replaced

Index Bridge (Arkansas)
Posted September 19, 2019, by Austin Ardwin

You can view the plans for this bridge at:

https://www.arkansashighways.com/historic_bridge/State%20Hig...

Posted September 19, 2019, by Austin Ardwin

You can view the original plans for this bridge here:

https://www.arkansashighways.com/historic_bridge/State%20Hig...

Note that the plans for this bridge include the removal of an older bridge, using the same north bank.

Posted September 18, 2019, by Melissa Brand-Welch (melissabrandwelch [at] msn [dot] com)

Love it

Posted September 17, 2019, by Tony J Anderson (scout2tony [at] gmail [dot] com)

This bridge was built very tall to accommodate a planned lake. Fortunately, the dam construction was prevented, and the Buffalo became the first National Scenic River. Even so, there are photos of the river in flood covering the roadway, some 90 feet above the normal river level. 1985, I believe.

Posted September 5, 2019, by Cliff Darby (clif30 [at] hotmail [dot] com)

It appears the old US 71 continued on this alignment and crossed the next creek at a now-lost bridge.

Posted August 22, 2019, by Sandra Pense Lynch (moomule [at] aol [dot] com)

My grandfather, Robert Pense of Winslow , Arkanasas, helped build the Winslow Tunnel. He was renowed in his community for his skill with an ax. My dad, Carl Pense, started jumping on the train in the tunnel at the age of about 12, riding to another community and buying a horse and small herd of cattle and taking them back to Winslow to sell. He moved to Illinois as a young man and became a successful farmer and livestock dealer, in spite of the fact that he never learned to read or write. Dad was killed in a truck accident in 1989 at the age of 72.

Posted August 19, 2019, by Tony J Anderson (scout2tony [at] gmail [dot] com)

Has anyone ever seen a photo of the complete bridge? I've searched through the Boone County museum's M&NA collection, and on line, finding nothing. There is one photo, taken from onboard a freight train, but nothing of the bridge itself.

Posted July 26, 2019, by David Backlin (us71 [at] cox [dot] net)

Bridge is scheduled for demolition in August of 2019

Posted July 19, 2019, by Jud Crandall

'bout a mile south of Massengill road.

Posted July 18, 2019, by Tony Dillon (spansaver [at] hotmail [dot] com)

Is this really a ro... yup it's on Google so it must be!

But there probably isn't one sign remaining on it!

Posted July 7, 2019, by John Humphrey (johnhumphrey1 [at] cox [dot] net)

What year was this bridge built?

Posted May 7, 2019, by William McFadden (jeeper360 [at] yahoo [dot] com)

This bridge was removed in 2016 after being replaced with a new bridge to the east.

Posted May 7, 2019, by William McFadden (jeeper360 [at] yahoo [dot] com)

It looks like phase 1 has been completed. The bridge has been removed.

Posted May 5, 2019, by Charles Bowden (charliesmail101 [at] gmail [dot] com)

I never got to see this classic. Open deck bridge with a wooden floor, 'total length: 400.8 ft.' what monster it must have been.

Posted May 4, 2019, by Charles Bowden (charliesmail101 [at] gmail [dot] com)

Thank You to Jennifer Cleveland for contributing this photo to BridgeHunter.com for history and for allowing me to post it here.

Posted April 14, 2019, by David Backlin (us71 [at] cox [dot] net)

The City of North Little Rock has signed over ownership of the bridge to the railroad who intends to demolish it.

Posted April 12, 2019, by Carroll Messer (cj [dot] messer [at] att [dot] net)

Correction to caption in Photo above which now states:

"Route of Beale road in Eastern Oklahoma

Shows the Beale road to Fort Smith across the Poteau river."

Correction to caption:

"Route of Beale Survey of 1858 in Eastern Oklahoma (Indian Territory). Shows Beale's survey route from Fort Smith across the Poteau river."

The important point is the map shows the route of Beale's survey not the finished wagon road from Fort Smith to Skullyville. I spent several months incorrectly thinking the map showed the Beale Wagon Road following the Butterfield Trail route, using the downtown ferry across the Poteau. The actual Whipple Iron Bridge crossing of the Poteau was nearly seven miles upriver (south) of the ferry site.

Posted March 30, 2019, by Steve White (swwogm64 [at] gmail [dot] com)

When was this ferry replaced by the bridge?

Posted March 27, 2019, by Tony Dillon (spansaver [at] hotmail [dot] com)

The Burr stone implanted into the pier is a nice touch!

Posted March 27, 2019, by Wade Rogers (vbpd435 [at] cox [dot] net)

My uncle Leonard Rogers lived across the road from this bridge when I was little in the 60's. I remember crossing this bridge to get to a Hay field. It was pretty scary then. Boards missing etc. I will ask my mother about the mill.

Posted March 23, 2019, by Tony Dillon (spansaver [at] hotmail [dot] com)

If I lived there I would make a killer pier out of that bridge!

Posted March 1, 2019, by Zane Lile (arkieguide [at] centurylink [dot] com)

Is there a place left to put a boat in Smiley bayou ? Have not been there to fish in several years. The question where it is try cr54.

Posted February 25, 2019, by Daniel

Given the 3 ton weight limit, I'm awfully surprised at how tall they allow. I can't imagine many vehicles at even 8' tall are 3 tons or less, and a lower max height would reduce the chances of another overweight vehicle damaging it.

Posted February 24, 2019, by John Penland (Lpenland [at] sbcglobal)

February 24, 2019. Great bridge, My wife wanted to get out of the truck and walk across instead of riding. Said it was too scary. Good pictures of it on this website. Thanks for posting.

Posted February 6, 2019, by Carroll Messer (cj [dot] messer [at] att [dot] net)

As of Feb. 2019, my research indicates that the site of the two-span Whipple Bowstring Iron Bridge completed in 1860 for the Beale Wagon Road crossing of the Poteau River was located just below the mouth of Cedar Creek. This location is about 400 yards west of the Tri-State Speedway, along the north side of US 271, OK 9 & 112, about 1.73 miles into Oklahoma from the Arkansas state line (at the Choctaw Pocola Casino) in southern Fort Smith (extension of I 540).

This Whipple Iron Bridge was destroyed in April 1861, probably by Federal cavalry as they evacuated Fort Smith and headed west on the Beale Wagon Road into Indian Territory, and later to Kansas. It appears that a second iron bridge was built at the same location sometime after 1870 and served until near Oklahoma statehood.

Posted February 4, 2019, by Tony Dillon (spansaver [at] hotmail [dot] com)

...And unfortunately it still happens!

Posted February 1, 2019, by Tony Dillon (spansaver [at] hotmail [dot] com)

So perhaps an older bridge that was moved to this location at some point between 1936-1956. And like so many times I have seen before the 1930 date was a poor default date!?

Posted February 1, 2019, by James Baughn (webmaster [at] bridgehunter [dot] com)

This one is a real head scratcher. The 1936 General History and Transportation Map of Yell County doesn't show a bridge or road here. The map shows plenty of other minor county roads, though.

The 1956 edition of the county map does clearly show the bridge and road.

So does this mean the bridge wasn't installed here until after 1936? Or was it merely omitted from the map?

Posted February 1, 2019, by Charles Pickern (sampickern [at] att [dot] net)

Truck in the river after collapse. Picture by yell county emergency Mngmint

Posted February 1, 2019, by Charles Pickern (sampickern [at] att [dot] net)

Truck in the river after collapse. Picture by yell county emergency Mngmint

Posted January 31, 2019, by Tony Dillon (spansaver [at] hotmail [dot] com)

Both the Vincennes Bridge Company and the Elkhart Bridge & Iron Company did build some pinned spans later than some of the other fabricators... But I've not personally seen any later than about 1920.

Posted January 31, 2019, by James Baughn (webmaster [at] bridgehunter [dot] com)

Arkansas has other pin-connected bridges that are documented to have been built after 1920.

In this case, the state's historic bridge inventory, National Register nomination, and the National Bridge Inventory data all say 1930. That's all we have unless somebody can find more specific evidence this bridge was built earlier.

Posted January 31, 2019, by Luke

Probably referencing the same pdf I linked below, supporting the plausibility of clerical error.

Posted January 31, 2019, by Dt (Dusty1088 [at] hotmail [dot] com)

Well the government says it was built in 1930

https://npgallery.nps.gov/NRHP/AssetDetail?assetID=1cb4193c-...

Posted January 30, 2019, by Nathan Holth (webmaster [at] historicbridges [dot] org)

I would suggest James Baughn consider doing a sweep of the database, cross referencing all instances where "pin connected" occurs in any date greater than say 1919. This should generate a relatively short list that could be checked manually... 90% of results returned would be bad dates and should be removed. Especially the ones that are rounded numbers (1930, 1920, etc) as those are almost always "default" dates when construction date is unknown. But the newspapers don't know that.

Posted January 30, 2019, by Nathan Holth (webmaster [at] historicbridges [dot] org)

Truck Drivers Wanted. Do you have a blood pulse? You can be a truck driver!

Literacy: Optional!

Common Sense: Optional!

Concern for Safety: Optional!

Posted January 30, 2019, by Luke

Date seems to stem from http://www.arkansaspreservation.com/National-Register-Listin..., which makes me think a clerical error may have led to 1903 becoming 1930.

Posted January 30, 2019, by Robert Elder (robertelder1 [at] gmail [dot] com)

(Blows whistle and throws yellow flag) "The listed construction date of 1930 is under review". (5 minutes later) "After further review, the ruling on the field has been overturned. This bridge has pinned connections and was not built in 1930."

Super Bowl references aside, I can guarantee you that this bridge was not built in 1930. By 1930, pinned connections had been replaced with riveted connections, even in the most rural, remote, and inaccessible parts of the country. I would suggest that this bridge was built Circa 1900 to 1910.

Now, I suppose there is a possibility that the bridge could have been disassembled and re-erected here in 1930. Likewise it could have possibly been rehabilitated in 1930.

Posted January 30, 2019, by Mike Kerkau (mjkerkau [at] gmail [dot] com)

https://www.fox16.com/news/state-news/semi-falls-through-yel...

Two things:

1) "According to the website bridgehunter.com this bridge was built in 1930." Gee, we have that good of a reputation so as to end up in news reporting?

2) "The sheriff says the driver was following GPS instructions and that this bridge is not fit for a truck of that size."

FACEPALM

This moron deserves whatever (reasonable) punishment should come his way.

Posted January 30, 2019, by Tony Dillon (spansaver [at] hotmail [dot] com)

Bridge was posted for 5 Tons just over 10 years ago... I assume it was still at that or less.

Another blind truck driver!

Posted January 30, 2019, by R.W. (rwscribe [at] gmail [dot] com )
Posted January 30, 2019, by Tony Dillon (spansaver [at] hotmail [dot] com)

That's unbelievable!!

Posted January 30, 2019, by Charles Bowden (charliesmail101 [at] gmail [dot] com)

I am sorry to report that tonight 1/30/19 around 8 p.m. the Dale Bend Bridge was collapsed by a Semi Truck. Photo by Trisha Holt / Galla Rock Volunteer Fire Dept.

Posted December 22, 2018, by Charles Petit (mountaincreekar [at] yahoo [dot] com)

The railroad swing truss bridge at Cotter was designed to swing open so that steamboats (with tall smoke stacks) could pass through when going up or down stream.

It is common that many call this type through bridge as a "Pratt" Truss. But it is not. It is a "Howe" Truss.

Reference:

https://skyciv.com/education/types-of-trusses/#howe

This through truss bridge at Cotter is really a "Howe" truss design. A Howe Truss is an upside-down Pratt.

For a "Pratt" type, when supported by piers on each end, the diagonal structural members (within the truss) slope downward in the direction to the center of the span.

For a "Howe" type, when supported on each ends by piers,

structural diagonal members within the truss slope downward in the direction of the ends of the span.

In the "Howe" design, (all but one) vertical structural members are in tension, directly holding up the bridge's deck below.

For the "Pratt" type, when supported on each end by piers, within the truss it has sloped diagonal downward members that point towards the center of the truss; and those "diagonal" members are in tension holding up the bridge's deck below. Just the opposite as in the Howe design where it pulls up "vertically".

If the Cotter "Howe" bridge was swung open, then the center bridge pier holds up the entire through truss bridge. The end piers no longer hold the truss bridge up. During the open period all the prior tension structural members become in compression. During the open period all the prior compression structural members become in tension. In the open position the bridge become a double cantilever structure. Since the Howe truss design has structural diagonal members sloping downward towards the bridge's ends, when swung open, those sloped members are pulling on the bottom of the truss, to effectively hold up the ends from straining downward.

The Howe and Warren truss designs are desired for swing bridges with only a center pior (when opened). For truss bridges that are not to be swung open, the truss can be either a Pratt, a Howe or the Warren design.

Take a look at;

Reference:

https://skyciv.com/education/types-of-trusses/#howe.

...

Posted December 22, 2018, by robert medlin (hydroman01 [at] yahoo [dot] com)

no trusses are standing, the other bridge is not far from collapsing in places

Posted December 21, 2018, by Charles Petit (mountaincreekar [at] yahoo [dot] com)

I think it would be prudent not to say that the bridge

swung open only once! That should be deleted. It is not needed in the description.

There are some people in Mountain Home, AR

that think that is not the case.

A few steamboat records imply they went

north from Buffalo City.

Just a few times, but can not be proven since

the St. Louis Iron Mountain and Southern Railroad

did not have any records. Many steamboats even operated at night.

Posted November 28, 2018, by Luke

Yeah, this isn't railroad.

Posted November 28, 2018, by Brian Gould (brian [dot] gould [at] sbcglobal [dot] net)

Random internet guy here--- I think the Barkshed bridge is WPA/CCC road bridge circa late 1930s, not MN&A. The MN&A in Stone County was to the Southwest and there was a stop at Arlburg. This is fresh to me because parts of the Ozark HIghlands Trail and the Buffalo River Trail are on old road beds, and we've hiked both sections recently. Really nice trails, and the Buffalo River Trail downstream from Gilbert leads to the piers of the MN&A bridge over the Buffalo.

Posted November 24, 2018, by Stacy Langley (stacylangley2004 [at] yahoo [dot] com)

What a jewel. Taken November 2018

Posted November 10, 2018, by Luke

.

Posted November 10, 2018, by Archie Marsh (Arch [dot] e [dot] marsh [at] gmail [dot] com)

To get to the other side.

Posted November 10, 2018, by Luke

Why did you add imagery of the bridge in Texas at the original location?

Posted October 19, 2018, by Denise L Ford (niseypoo1931 [at] gmail [dot] com)

My parents were both born and raised in Cleburne County and my Grandma lived in Heber Springs on Hwy 110. From 1965 to 1972 we made several trips from Fresno California in our 1965 Chevy Impala.I remember several times Daddy would drive across that one lane bridge really fast, and as soon as we got to the other side he'd flip a U-turn and we would watch that thing swing back and forth! It was so exciting! Of coarse my mom made Daddy pull the car over so she could get out. But my sister and I would scream and giggle the whole time! I really miss Daddy...great memories.

Posted October 17, 2018, by George Oakley (Georgeoakley49 [at] yahoo [dot] com)

Just saw the video showing the bus crossing the bridge.Can't believe how the bridge didn't collapse from the weight.The video shows everything.You can see the bridge deck moving under the bus.

Posted October 16, 2018, by Clark Vance (cvance [at] dogmail [dot] com)

Touring coach GVWR 53,000 lb or roughly 25 tons. Find and fine the bozo and his company.

https://www.prevostcar.com/sites/default/files/attachments/h...

Posted October 16, 2018, by Daniel

Are you sure that the weight of the bus was "at least three times" the 10 ton rating? A quick google has much lower values than that.

https://www.apta.com/resources/reportsandpublications/Docume...

that states a typical (transit, can't find tour bus info) bus is curb weight of 20-33,000lb (10-16.5 tons), and GVWR 30-44,000lb (15-22 tons). Still way heavier than should be on the bridge, but 60,000lb/30 tons is far higher than I'd expect given that the maximum allowed weight for a semi (with far more axles) is generally 72,000lb/36 tons.

Posted October 16, 2018, by David Backlin (us71 [at] cox [dot] net)

Fortunately, the bridge appears to have suffered no damage according to ARDOT, but the bus driver needs to fined at the very least

Posted October 15, 2018, by Jason Smith (flensburg [dot] bridgehunter [dot] av [at] googlemail [dot] com)

Let's catch the stupid bus driver for crossing this fragile bridge with an overloaded tour bus, shall we? This is SO not cool! https://bridgehunterschronicles.wordpress.com/2018/10/16/ove...

Posted October 3, 2018, by Robert Elder (robertelder1 [at] gmail [dot] com)

I did a quick field visit to this bridge today. It is still open to traffic. The new bridge is still a long ways from being completed so you probably have at least a few more months to see this bridge. The Center span of the new bridge still has no I beams in place. I was surprised as I figured that it would be much farther along by this time.

That being said, you will want to get here as quick as you can. This bridge will not be around forever and it is very much worth seeing.

Posted October 3, 2018, by Robert Elder (robertelder1 [at] gmail [dot] com)

I drove across this bridge today. All I can say is, wow!

I did not have time to take photos and document the bridge because I was trying to get to Paducah, Kentucky. The bridge is open to traffic and the road is paved at both ends. This bridge is easy to visit if you are driving past on Highway 67.

Posted October 2, 2018, by Matt Cook (mattratcathat [at] yahoo [dot] com)

I'm pretty sure this bridge has been replaced.

Posted September 14, 2018, by Kevin (crudbud9 [at] gmail [dot] com)

I recently purchased an old photo album of postcard size photos of construction of the mulberry river bridge Franklin co.Arkansas. They have white lettering on front with info like a rppc just no postage or ink on reverse. If anyone is interested in purchasing email me. They have interesting equipment and crews at work. Some pages are written with markings for example " M-3 B-15" thanks.

Posted September 7, 2018, by Dana and Kay Klein

Thanks for sharing Tony!

Posted September 7, 2018, by Tony McKinley (OzarkWilbur [at] gmail [dot] com)

Pic

Posted September 6, 2018, by Deron (stewmiller42 [at] gmail [dot] com)

Featured in teaser trailer for True Detective 3

Posted September 5, 2018, by Tony McKinley (Ozarkwilbur [at] gmail [dot] com)

I fish this area a lot and live only mins away. This bridge is referred to locally as "Old Town Bridge". Pretty neat site y'all have here. I just stumbled upon it looking online for bridges to fish. Lol Next time I'm fishing in the area I'll snap y'all a pic.

Posted August 8, 2018, by William Bohannon (bbfudpucker [at] yahoo [dot] com)

When I was going to college at ASU in Jonesboro, and going home to Searcy, ever so often I'd take US 64. More than once, I got stuck on this bridge with farm equipment coming towards me. Driving in reverse off this bridge wasn't a lot of fun.

Posted August 7, 2018, by Clark Vance (cvance [at] dogmail [dot] com)

Creation of the Gardens began in 1956.

Posted July 31, 2018, by William Bohannon (bbfudpucker [at] yahoo [dot] com)

This was not a Mo Pac bridge. It was part of the Missouri North Arkansas or Missouri and Arkansas line. It was removed not long after the line from Harrison to Cotton Plant was removed circa 1947-48.

Posted July 29, 2018, by Chad (chad605 [at] gmail [dot] com)

Actually these first nine images are of the old 70 bridge and not the 7 bridge. As I mentioned in a previous comment, I have crossed this bridge countless times since 1975. I can find old photos and more current ones to prove that these first nine photos are NOT the 7 bridge.

Posted July 29, 2018, by Chad (Chad605 [at] gmai [dot] com)

That first picture is the 70 bridge not the 7 bridge. I can go back and tell you which numbers are the 70 bridge versus the 7 bridge. I have crossed these bridges countless times since 1975.

Posted July 24, 2018, by E Allen H Blackwood (eblackwo [at] gmail [dot] com)

Work has started in the restoration of this bridge, which is estimated to cost $2.8 million.

See: https://bentoncourier.com/content/efforts-restore-river-brid...

You can also see pictures and more information about the organization which was founded to preserve the bridge, etc at: https://www.salinecrossing.com/ (Photos from May 2018: https://www.salinecrossing.com/photos)

Posted July 8, 2018, by Toby Plumlee (tobytplumlee1973 [at] gmail [dot] com)

Hi, would love for Mr.Houp to get in touch with me. I read his book on the Plumlee family when I was 12 years old. I'm 45 now and I have been researching on the family for over 33 years now. Thank you Mr. Houp. I just missed you about 3 or 4 years ago I was in Berryville Arkansas at the court house researching. The kind ladies told me I just missed you by about 10 minutes and that you were there researching Bridges

Posted July 7, 2018, by Sunny O'Neal (psfla [at] yahoo [dot] com)

7-7-18 Is the bridge intact now ? Is it near County Road 36 ?

Posted June 20, 2018, by Luke

We don't know, we're not a governmental agency.

Posted June 20, 2018, by Lesley (Aaabrake [at] att [dot] ney)

Why it’s been closed for months ???

How much longer ???

June 20 2018

Posted June 19, 2018, by David Backlin (us71 [at] cox [dot] net)

There is now a Facebook page dedicated to saving this bridge: https://www.facebook.com/Bigwhiteriverbridge/

According to the latest update, the group was given an additional 45 days on May 24th to save the bridge.

Posted June 8, 2018, by David Backlin (us71 [at] cox [dot] net)

NBI suggests this was likely abandoned circa 1962.

Posted May 13, 2018, by David Backlin (us71 [at] cox [dot] net)

I visited this bridge on 5-13-2018. It is totally within the bounds of Craighead County by approximately 1/2 mile.

Posted May 11, 2018, by Jay Bissell (jay_54714 [at] yahoo [dot] com)

A few pictures taken 4-18-2018.

Posted May 10, 2018, by Eric Kinkhorst (erick [dot] bud [at] gmail [dot] com)

It's hard for me to believe that the White river was a navigable steam to begin with. That being said,I think the placement of the the swing pier could interrupt the natural flow of the river and cause it to change course. I've been to Cotter and the river there looks more like a float trip stream. Can't imagine any steam boats going by here.

Posted April 21, 2018, by George Cash (Lazzeris [at] att [dot] net)

Please stay out of the tunnel for your safety. My aunt said be very careful where you go some of the neighbors are not so friendly.

Posted March 12, 2018, by Nathan Holth (webmaster [at] historicbridges [dot] org)

Yes, there was a bridge before this bridge per HAER documentation, but I am not sure what type it was. It was noted that the previous bridge was in good condition, the main reason it was replaced was its design load capacity was not high enough. So it is quite possible you found remnants of the previous bridge.

Posted March 12, 2018, by Melissa Jones (mrhsfan [at] gmail [dot] com)

I am sad to report that this bridge has been demolished. According to the AR Dept. of Transportation, the date plaque from the bridge has been donated to the Natural Dam Community Center to be displayed there. The photo below was taken a few days before the bridge was taken down.

Posted March 12, 2018, by Cathy richardson (Tomcat1966 [at] att [dot] net)

When was this railroad bridge built?

Posted March 12, 2018, by Joe (admin [at] jaspercomp [dot] com)

downstream of the current bridge, back in the woods on the opposite side of the river, there appears to be another base for a previous bridge...I know this one was built in 1931, but was there one before this? Pic attached.

Joe

Posted March 5, 2018, by David Backlin (us71 [at] cox [dot] net)

http://www.arkansasonline.com/news/2018/mar/04/judge-gives-g...

Judge gives 90 days to save Clarendon Bridge

Posted March 4, 2018, by Pete Williams (odolaas69 [at] gmail [dot] com)

The destroyed bridge was a truss, but its replacement isn't, so this should be 2 separate entries. One for the bridge that was destroyed by a tornado, another entry for the replacement, plus a third entry for the ferry AHTD ran while the new bridge was being built.